We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Guaranteed Rental Schemes

A question to landlords....

What's your opinion of companies offering guaranteed rental schemes? There are schemes out there that will pay 70% of the market rent for 12 months. The company then become the tenant and pay you that amount regardless of whether there is a tenant in your property or not. They make their money from the difference they manage to rent it out and the amount they pay you.

The value is certainty of rent. There argument is that for a 2 year period, on average there will be 3 months of the 24 that the property will be vacant, whereas this scheme provides certainty.

The downside is that say you had a property that you could let for 500 a month, they would pay you 350 a month for a year - guaranteed.

In your opinion, are these schemes attractive and worthwhile?

Thanks

Comments

  • sooz
    sooz Posts: 4,560 Forumite
    Depends on the market where your BTL is. Personally, I would think you could 'guarantee' yourself the same certainty of very little void periods if you marketed your property yourself for £350 rather than £500!

    Keep your property in really good condition, and price it at a little below market value. You should have people lining up to rent it.
  • plane_boy2000
    plane_boy2000 Posts: 1,482 Forumite
    Depends how much care they take in selecting their tennants! My guess is that they will stick anyone in so that they can start getting money in. Do they offer any guarantees in terms of condition of property upon return to you?

    Is it Northwood?
  • Doozergirl
    Doozergirl Posts: 34,080 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Do you think they do it out of the goodness of their hearts or do you think they might profit from it? It's money for old rope!

    If the average is 3 months out of 24, you lose 12.5%. So you want to pay someone 30% to insure against a 12.5% loss? You would have to be bonkers! I can almost guarantee that their tack would be to not be too picky over who they let it to.

    You can do exactly what sooz says; keep it nice and advertise at slightly less than the going rate and you will minimise your voids. Read up on letting it privately and properly; protect your asset and save on agent's fees also.
    Everything that is supposed to be in heaven is already here on earth.
  • Planeboy - yes it is northwood. Have you had any dealings with them, either from a tenant or landlord experience?

    Sooz - good point about putting the property on a slightly below market value to improve the chances.

    My friend has approached northwood regarding a franchise opportunity and he has asked whether I would be interested in putting in some capital for an equity stake in his business. I wouldn't see that money back for the first year or two but in the medium/longer term I would be taking a monthly income as a % of the monthly billage.

    With the company paying away 70% and taking the rest, they are effectively making 25-30% margins comparing to the 10-15% margins of traditional renting. In my mind, the best way to find out whether this is a business idea that would work and be profitable, I should be gaining the reaction of actual landlords and people who've dealt with the company, so all feedback and thoughts are appreciated.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.