We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Conviction

When using compare the market it asked whether i had EVER had any not motoring convictions. I do have convictions but they are spent and so never normally have to disclose them. Do I have to in this case? It doesn't ask any more details of them but by indicating I have one it increases my premium quotes by over a third!

Comments

  • vaio
    vaio Posts: 12,287 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    As long as they are spent then they don't need to be disclosed.

    Further, any company that increases premiums as a result of being told about spent convictions is in breech of the law although I'm not sure who the enforcement body would be (FOS? FSA?)
  • Covered by Rehabilitation of Offenders Act. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1974/53/section/4


    (2) Subject to the provisions of any order made under subsection (4) below, where a question seeking information with respect to a person’s previous convictions, offences, conduct or circumstances is put to him or to any other person otherwise than in proceedings before a judicial authority—

    (a)the question shall be treated as not relating to spent convictions or to any circumstances ancillary to spent convictions, and the answer thereto may be framed accordingly; and

    (b)the person questioned shall not be subjected to any liability or otherwise prejudiced in law by reason of any failure to acknowledge or disclose a spent conviction or any circumstances ancillary to a spent conviction in his answer to the question.
  • Aretnap
    Aretnap Posts: 6,073 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Financial Ombudsman on spent convictions
    By way of analogy, there seems no reason why a rehabilitated drink-driver, if he had evidence, would not have an equally strong case if he was refused insurance or was given less favourable terms and conditions than other policyholders, simply because of his spent conviction. If firms insist on asking questions about spent convictions, then they must effectively ignore the answers they receive. Otherwise, we are likely to consider they have breached their statutory duty.

    Similarly, if a firm cancels the policy of a customer who has a spent conviction (but whose licence is still endorsed), simply because the customer did not disclose the endorsement, then we will uphold the customer’s complaint.
    The article deals specifically with motoring convictions, but the law is exactly the same whether or not a conviction is a motoring one.

    NB There are exceptions to the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act when you're applying for certain jobs which require a high degree of trust, such as the police, accountancy or jobs which involve working with children. However there is no exception for insurance companies.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.1K Life & Family
  • 260.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.