I just do not get people ...

miduck

squidge60 wrote: »

Theres always one who dosent bother to read the post properly !!!!!!:rotfl:

I read it - you are overreacting.

squidge60

miduck wrote: »

I read it - you are overreacting.

You use the word peodo ( i didnt)and I am over reacting noone mentioned implied anything like it :rotfl:
But hey i dont do trolls !!
So anything else you post are on ignore.!

miduck

squidge60 wrote: »

You use the word peodo ( i didnt)and I am over reacting noone mentioned implied anything like it :rotfl:
But hey i dont do trolls !!
So anything else you post are on ignore.!

So anyone that disagrees with you is a troll? Another overreaction ...

You mentioned child abuse - who commits child abuse? Yep, that would be a p*edophile.

Valli

Right.

From your initial post I assumed you just found it unpleasant to think that a child was urinating in public - because it was unhygenic. It never occurred to me your issue was that some pervert might be titilated by the sight of it.
Personally I would rather children urinate if they need to than have to cover up for fear of provoking 'inappropriate' behaviour.
Child protection should be about limiting the actions of adults, not restricting the children.

Paddles

squidge60 wrote: »

I guess some on here are the same people who would deem it fine for their children to be naked on the beach because hey thats fine wheres the harm in that :rotfl:

Oops is there a harm, mine are quite frequently naked on the beach, they are between 1 and 4 and I honestly don't see the harm in it :-)

That said I think this person could have taken their child somewhere a little more private but there were probably circumstances that made them make that decision .

squidge60

Valli wrote: »

Right.

From your initial post I assumed you just found it unpleasant to think that a child was urinating in public - because it was unhygenic. It never occurred to me your issue was that some pervert might be titilated by the sight of it.
Personally I would rather children urinate if they need to than have to cover up for fear of provoking 'inappropriate' behaviour.
Child protection should be about limiting the actions of adults, not restricting the children.

The ONE AND ONLY issue i had with it was the child was in full view of everyone going in/out of Tesco and the guy didnt think to be discreet.
Nothing more nothing less but some people on here seem determined to make it about more than that (maybe i could have worded it better but that is it):)

squidge60

Paddles wrote: »

Loops is there a harm, mine are quite frequently naked on the beach, they are between 1 and 4 and I honestly don't see the harm in it :-)

That said I think this person could have taken their child somewhere a little more private but there were probably circumstances that made them make that decision .

Your children your choice

Valli

squidge60 wrote: »

The ONE AND ONLY issue i had with it was the child was in full view of everyone going in/out of Tesco and the guy didnt think to be discreet.
Nothing more nothing less but some people on here seem determined to make it about more than that (maybe i could have worded it better but that is it):)

Fair enough but it was a toddler - discretion wasn't key here. Personally I think he should have found a grate (drain cover;)) and held her over that.
TBH if you're holding a girl, weeing there isn't much to see. Unless you really look. Because you're holding her in a sort of sitting position really...
And what kind of person makes an effort to look?

flashnazia

I have to admit this would annoy me too.

It's not the bare bottom that would annoy me but the fact that someone could be so shameless as to make their child urinate in such a public way. It's not as if public toilets are scarce and even then there are discreet ways of letting a child wee (in corner etc).

It seems a bit chavvy that's all.

squidge60

flashnazia wrote: »

I have to admit this would annoy me too.

It's not the bare bottom that would annoy me but the fact that someone could be so shameless as to make their child urinate in such a public way. It's not as if public toilets are scarce and even then there are discreet ways of letting a child wee (in corner etc).

It seems a bit chavvy that's all.

Yes someone who "gets it".
Thankyou :T