We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Injury claims are about to change forever!
Comments
-
just money-grabbing probably! I bet the TV channels are worried about the potential loss of income for the industry's dire commercials.0
-
Several, including fraud.
It appears you suggested that a paper pusher could litigate a claim, rather than a solicitor, when the claimant believes a solicitor to, rightfully, be undertaking the task instead.
That's rather vague... for example where in the Fraud Act does it state a non-solicitor can't litigate on behalf of another person...
So are you saying only solicitors can litigate? And a non-solicitor cannot? Because many people will choose to self-represent and I fail to see how this is unlawful.
Feel free to substantiate this comment and be a little more specific?0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.5K Spending & Discounts
- 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards