We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

old banger needed, advice on which to buy please

13

Comments

  • mkirkby
    mkirkby Posts: 279 Forumite
    I'd avoid anything French at any age, car wise anyway.

    I would have agreed until I did some research. Older Citroens (especially with the 1.9 XUD engine) do tend to be pretty well sorted and bolted together well.

    Definitely better than their Pug cousins anyway
  • mkirkby
    mkirkby Posts: 279 Forumite
    andygb wrote: »
    I would avoid air conditioning,

    Surely only relevant if you care whether it works or not? Mine doesn't; never has and it doesn't bother me.
  • Thats easy if you say to the seller start it up and he gives you a mad look and says its running. Thats the one.

    If it rattles like a cement mixer and chucks blue smoke out the back then its a rover engine. :)

    Wrong. The early K series was a damp-liner design with a closed deck, and rarely suffered issue.
    It was the later K that had (much exaggerated IMO) head gasket issues.

    And wrong again, have you ever actually heard a properly-looked after K series? Very smooth, quiet and remarkably fuel efficient for the year.
    Blue smoke indicates shot piston rings, in fact the K series rarely suffers with any other issues than HGF.

    This is a 'helpful' site, why chuck unsupported and incorrect opinions in to the mix?
    pgilc1 wrote: »
    That was in the generation before that - it would have been a '213' or '216'.

    The 213 was the honda engine and the 216 was the BL engine.

    The Rover picture came 'as standard' with a 1.4 litre 16v K Series engine. There were others engines available, but that was the most common. Notorious for head gasket failure hence relatively few left on the roads.

    Not worth the hassle seeking one out in my opinion

    Nope, the engine fitted to most R8 (wedge) Rover 216s was the Honda engine.
  • motorguy
    motorguy Posts: 22,626 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper

    Nope, the engine fitted to most R8 (wedge) Rover 216s was the Honda engine.

    The standard car - and the one most sold - was the Rover 214 Si 16v, and that was a K Series engine.

    That would have been the most popular variant - i was selling them at the time both new and used. When the K Series cam out it was hailed as revolutionary, thus when new few people would have avoided them in favour of the more expensive but little more powerful 1.6 variant.

    Yes, the 1.6 was Honda and the 2.0 was the Rover M Series engine followed by the T Series.

    I had quite a few of these subsequently come to me with cylinder head trouble in their twilight years (and before)
  • And wrong again, have you ever actually heard a properly-looked after K series

    Is there such a thing?:rotfl:
  • http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/1999-KIA-PRIDE-SX-GREEN-/251211559954?pt=Automobiles_UK&hash=item3a7d603412


    No it is not mine or anything to do with me. Am damn good at picking up bangers and that one has a righteous feel about it.
  • http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/1999-KIA-PRIDE-SX-GREEN-/251211559954?pt=Automobiles_UK&hash=item3a7d603412


    No it is not mine or anything to do with me. Am damn good at picking up bangers and that one has a righteous feel about it.

    No effort in the description and only 2 pictures.

    1st thing you need is a good story, second things plenty pictures.

    From that I can normally get a "feel" then I can decide whether to ask a question or 2 and call the seller or just leave it.
  • is a Seat Arosa 1997 worth £595? Its 77K miles, says it has full service history, has MPG in the 50's even though it's petrol, the one im looking at is very clean and tidy on the pics. Did VW build Seat's in 1997? i.e. is it a VW car with a Seat badge or is it an unreliable old "real" Seat? I'd rather go for a civic but their MPG is crap compared to this smaller car and for the same price, why not?
  • pgilc1 wrote: »
    K series engine and the head gasket made from chocolate?
    think youll find i reccomended the concerto not the rover the simulartity is what i posted i.e pics of it to show the OP what it may have inside it (better than a civic IMHO), early H J (K?) has a honda 1.6 engine in some rovers.
  • ive found 1 concerto 200 miles away from me, £495 with 77k miles. worth the long drive to see it?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 247K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.