We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

The MSE Forum Team would like to wish you all a Merry Christmas. However, we know this time of year can be difficult for some. If you're struggling during the festive period, here's a list of organisations that might be able to help
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Has MSE helped you to save or reclaim money this year? Share your 2025 MoneySaving success stories!

I bought a used car with damaged disc brakes.

124»

Comments

  • Lorian
    Lorian Posts: 6,436 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    No test drive before purchase?

    How old is the car?
  • Hintza
    Hintza Posts: 19,420 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    So from what some are saying:-

    If I bought a car in Plymouth to take back to Unst and I decided the brakes were not quite right then I should expect the dealer to collect?
  • Hintza wrote: »
    So from what some are saying:-

    If I bought a car in Plymouth to take back to Unst and I decided the brakes were not quite right then I should expect the dealer to collect?

    Nope. But equally you shouldn't be required to return it.

    Therefore probably sufficient mitigation of loss to get a third party to rectify and recover the cost.
  • Hintza
    Hintza Posts: 19,420 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Nope. But equally you shouldn't be required to return it.

    The accepted way of dealing with problems with used cars is that the buyer should return it to the dealer who then has the opportunity to repair it.

    It was the OPs choice to drive an excessive distance.

    I would suspect that if this went to court and was appealed to a higher court it could feasibly end up as setting precedent one way or another.
  • As per previous responses, you must give the dealer opportunity to rectify.

    Also, warped brakes isn't a reason not to drive a car at all - it's just annoying with the vibration when braking
  • Hintza wrote: »
    The accepted way of dealing with problems with used cars is that the buyer should return it to the dealer who then has the opportunity to repair it.

    It was the OPs choice to drive an excessive distance.

    I would suspect that if this went to court and was appealed to a higher court it could feasibly end up as setting precedent one way or another.

    Yes but it is only the normal way as the purchaser has a duty to mitigate losses under English common law and to return to the retailer is generally the way to do that.

    Have to remember that SoGA is on top of basic contract law. Accordingly, a claim in damages could still be made and nothing in SoGA stops that.
  • spacey2012
    spacey2012 Posts: 5,836 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    SOGA is also on top of EU legislation that does offer a few hidden extras they dont want you to know about.
    Be happy...;)
  • bod1467
    bod1467 Posts: 15,214 Forumite
    Not the "secret EU law" again? ;)
  • System
    System Posts: 178,390 Community Admin
    10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    When will people realise that EU Directive 1999/44/EC was NOT enshrined in law in the UK because the Sale of Goods Act provides more extensive cover for the consumer.

    BTW It was only a directive and not a law that can be used in court
    This is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com
  • !!!!!! wrote: »
    When will people realise that EU Directive 1999/44/EC was NOT enshrined in law in the UK because the Sale of Goods Act provides more extensive cover for the consumer.

    BTW It was only a directive and not a law that can be used in court

    Actually, techincally it was with the change from "merchantable" to "satisfactory" quality and a breakdown of what satisfactory quality actually means (freedom from minor defects, durability, etc)....

    And in theory directives could be used in Court as either direct effective or in interpreting legislation.

    Sorry, will go back to my ivory tower now.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 246K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 602.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.8K Life & Family
  • 259.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.