We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Redundancy cover limitations (benefits, etc)

redonion
Posts: 215 Forumite
OK, I'm not actively looking for redundancy cover yet, but I just made myself curious by asking my last question
so here I go:
I read a post by somebody on here (I can no longer find it) that said that his redundancy policy stopped paying out after 12 weeks or so, when he expected it to pay for up to 12 months. In his case he said that was because if the benefits office said that he had to take a job, the insurance stopped paying out.
I realise that these policies can vary quite a bit, but what are some common limitations like this, that are not necessarily immediately apparent from the sales pitch?
What are some products that are on the less limited end of the scale? I'm sure it'll be easy to find the ones on the other end of the scale, because if they're cheap they'll be quite limited - but if they're expensive, they might just be expensive!

I read a post by somebody on here (I can no longer find it) that said that his redundancy policy stopped paying out after 12 weeks or so, when he expected it to pay for up to 12 months. In his case he said that was because if the benefits office said that he had to take a job, the insurance stopped paying out.
I realise that these policies can vary quite a bit, but what are some common limitations like this, that are not necessarily immediately apparent from the sales pitch?
What are some products that are on the less limited end of the scale? I'm sure it'll be easy to find the ones on the other end of the scale, because if they're cheap they'll be quite limited - but if they're expensive, they might just be expensive!
0
Comments
-
Policies require your form to be stamped by the benefits agency. If the benefits people saying you are intentionally depriving yourself of employment by not taking jobs available then most insurers wont pay out.
ASU tends to be a basic policy and therefore for the "U" part doesnt tend to have the concept of a like for like job - though there evidently may be some that do.0 -
OK, so especially in times like these - and only getting more so in the forseeable future, it's hard to see how a policy like this is going to pay out for more than 3 months, right? If you haven't found a job in your previous occupation, or whatever new occupation you decide to aim for instead, you'll be packed off to McDonalds or whoever might hire you in a job that you might view as a mistake in the long-term, and that'll be the end of your insurance payout.
Maybe that's still useful, but it obviously makes a big difference to how much this is worth.
I'm still very much interested to hear what other limitations people run into with unemployment cover, by the way.0 -
But 3 months worth of payouts maybe better than just getting benefits.Censorship Reigns Supreme in Troll City...0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards