We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Redundancy cover limitations (benefits, etc)

Options
OK, I'm not actively looking for redundancy cover yet, but I just made myself curious by asking my last question :) so here I go:

I read a post by somebody on here (I can no longer find it) that said that his redundancy policy stopped paying out after 12 weeks or so, when he expected it to pay for up to 12 months. In his case he said that was because if the benefits office said that he had to take a job, the insurance stopped paying out.

I realise that these policies can vary quite a bit, but what are some common limitations like this, that are not necessarily immediately apparent from the sales pitch?

What are some products that are on the less limited end of the scale? I'm sure it'll be easy to find the ones on the other end of the scale, because if they're cheap they'll be quite limited - but if they're expensive, they might just be expensive!

Comments

  • Policies require your form to be stamped by the benefits agency. If the benefits people saying you are intentionally depriving yourself of employment by not taking jobs available then most insurers wont pay out.

    ASU tends to be a basic policy and therefore for the "U" part doesnt tend to have the concept of a like for like job - though there evidently may be some that do.
  • redonion
    redonion Posts: 215 Forumite
    OK, so especially in times like these - and only getting more so in the forseeable future, it's hard to see how a policy like this is going to pay out for more than 3 months, right? If you haven't found a job in your previous occupation, or whatever new occupation you decide to aim for instead, you'll be packed off to McDonalds or whoever might hire you in a job that you might view as a mistake in the long-term, and that'll be the end of your insurance payout.

    Maybe that's still useful, but it obviously makes a big difference to how much this is worth.

    I'm still very much interested to hear what other limitations people run into with unemployment cover, by the way.
  • forgotmyname
    forgotmyname Posts: 32,925 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    But 3 months worth of payouts maybe better than just getting benefits.
    Censorship Reigns Supreme in Troll City...

This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.