We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Section 75 Advice Required
Comments
-
I have no idea of this place.0
-
yangptangkipperbang wrote: »S75 is part of British Law - the Chargeback system is operated by the finance houses as a "service" to their customers. It has no Legal backing whatsoever and the finance house can choose not to repay under this scheme at its own discretion.
This is probably why, in my case, I was told that "Mastercard rules" applied.
S75 = Loss to card provider.
Chargeback = Loss to retailer or the retailers merchant bank...
Which route do you think MBNA will take.:rotfl:
People band S75 around like sweets when there are payment issues on a credit card. (usually by people who do not know all the options)
It is very rearly used by any CC co for the above reasons.
While chargebacks have no legal standing. NO merchant can avoid one against as they have agreed to the scheme when they signed to take the cards.
TBH. I think people are a lot better educated now. As they ask what can do done to assist. Rather than come on stating "I want to claim. S75". You then spent most of the time argueing with them about incorrect advice they had recieved from the internet. Rather than getting to the crux of the matter and getting it sorted.Never ASSUME anything its makes a>>> A55 of U & ME <<<0 -
dalesrider wrote: »Which route do you think MBNA will take.:rotfl:
The way I see it, s75 gives you enforceable rights in particular situations. That can form the basis of a claim. If the situation suits chargeback, then the CC can use this as a method of recovery from the merchant and discharging their legal liability to the cardholder. So if the CC wants to go that route, I would always cooperate.
Their are situations where s75 apply, but chargeback is available (eg under £100) and vice-versa (eg where the cardholder's loss exceeds the transaction value).0 -
think op was a windupDon't put your trust into an Experian score - it is not a number any bank will ever use & it is generally a waste of money to purchase it. They are also selling you insurance you dont need.0
-
I don't see how s.56 could possibly apply to a credit card transaction??I think you will find thats Section 56...
s.56 deals with regulating the formation of the credit agreement to finance a transaction. When you get a credit card you are opening a running-account credit agreement with which you can finance any retail transaction you wish and s.75 covers you for misrepresentations made by the suppliers.
s.56 is supposed to protect you when you're being mislead while forming a new credit agreement to finance a contract, such as a hire loan agreement.
Chattychappy is correct that s.75 is all the OP's parents need.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455K Spending & Discounts
- 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178K Life & Family
- 260.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards