We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

The Polls - Labour Lead At 14 - Is It The Economy?

1235743

Comments

  • ILW
    ILW Posts: 18,333 Forumite
    LauraW10 wrote: »
    The current government are cutting spending but they are also stifling growth. No growth means no tax receipts - which means bigger debts - bigger than a country would have had. That's why austerity doesn't work - it's a death spiral.

    The coalition's biggest failure was smashing business and consumer confidence when they came to power - absolute madness. Labour would not have done that - so yes I believe that things would have been much better under a Labour government.

    Well that is obviously wrong for a start.
  • LauraW10
    LauraW10 Posts: 400 Forumite
    The thing is - Labour are never going to cut these things, so are an absolutely suicidal option. The cons dont have it all right - but there the closest we have that will potentially stop the UK going completely bancrupt.

    No no no - you've got it wrong they are going to make us bankrupt!!!! They are going to stifle growth so that there is no tax income - they are going to batter confidence so companies and consumers are going to be scared to spend money. They are leading us to disaster.
    If you keep doing what you've always done - you will keep getting what you've always got.
  • Wookster
    Wookster Posts: 3,795 Forumite
    StevieJ wrote: »
    I am saying that debt has increased by £360 billion in two years of Tory govt against £450 billion in thirteen years of Labour, now check that statement below again.

    Sorry Stevie but this is a stupid comment. The current government inherited the highest deficit i.e. annual rate of growth of the deficit of an industrialised nation from the Labour government.

    That the deficit is still rising, albeit at a lower rate is entirely down to the state of the finances in May 2010.

    The notion that you can reduce the deficit by borrowing more is just plain stupid.
  • ILW
    ILW Posts: 18,333 Forumite
    LauraW10 wrote: »
    No no no - you've got it wrong they are going to make us bankrupt!!!! They are going to stifle growth so that there is no tax income - they are going to batter confidence so companies and consumers are going to be scared to spend money. They are leading us to disaster.

    Coming from someone whose economic understanding goes as far as believe that without growth there will be no tax receipts. I will take it with a pinch of salt.
  • StevieJ
    StevieJ Posts: 20,174 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    What do you think should be done with extra incoming revenue?

    Would you prefer it to be ignored suddenly?

    I really don't understand this bitter complaint that income over the next year has been included in the income figures. Would you rather it was ignored? You could then claim they didn't know what they were doing, and ask where the 4G money was, and what they are hiding....

    Either way, whatever they do, you'll say it's wrong.

    Simple, if it due to be RECEIVED in the current financial year then include , if not then don't.
    'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher
  • LauraW10
    LauraW10 Posts: 400 Forumite
    Wookster wrote: »
    Borrowing has fallen.

    No borrowing is rising. Without the £28 billion from the PO pension fund, £12 billion interest from QE and the £4 billion from 4G the deficit has risen.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-20615650
    If you keep doing what you've always done - you will keep getting what you've always got.
  • coastline
    coastline Posts: 1,662 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Modest debt? Last time debt was this high relative to GDP was in war time.

    It is saddling future generations with massive debt. Future generations who are going to have other concerns that this current generation doesnt have - such as high energy prices, shortage of oil and gas, global warming, over population.

    High debt has a reflection on financial markets which has a major bearing on the UK economy. Imagine if the UK falls out of favour with big companies as a place to do business - it would permanently cripple the UK. It would be akin to banks moving out of Switzerland.

    [IMG]http://www.ukpublicspending.co.uk/ukgs_line.php?title=Public Net Debt&year=1970_2011&sname=&units=p&bar=0&stack=1&size=m&spending0=63.99_57.99_55.46_49.48_47.87_43.48_44.81_45.70_46.76_43.61_42.11_44.40_44.55_43.13_43.59_43.45_41.81_39.14_34.98_29.30_26.69_25.27_26.70_30.97_36.05_39.55_41.20_41.93_40.14_37.85_35.38_30.58_29.34_30.46_31.84_33.80_34.85_35.57_36.61_44.26_52.08_59.97&legend=&source=a_a_a_a_a_a_a_a_a_a_a_a_a_a_a_a_a_a_a_a_a_a_a_a_a_a_a_a_a_a_a_a_a_a_a_a_a_a_a_a_a_a[/IMG]

    National debt to GDP was high in the 1970's...its been falling ever since.
    The spending cap under the Tory government had it as low as 30% GDP...and during a recession as high as 45%.GDP
    Labour decided to spend more so attempted to run it at 35% ish..??
    This was constant until the developements of 2008....at this point you've got to factor in world events.
    Even in a mild recession under the Tory formula we would have been at 45% GDP...now add on a world slump with no growth..and add on privatisation of our banks....sharp have it to 60%.
  • Graham_Devon
    Graham_Devon Posts: 58,560 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    StevieJ wrote: »
    Simple, if it due to be RECEIVED in the current financial year then include , if not then don't.

    It is due to be received, is it not?

    Remember, this stuff was written by the OBR. Not George.
  • Graham_Devon
    Graham_Devon Posts: 58,560 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    LauraW10 wrote: »
    No borrowing is rising. Without the £28 billion from the PO pension fund and the £4 billion from 4G the deficit has risen.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-20615650

    I like this.

    If you ignore the income, borrowing is rising. Well bravo. It's really annoyed some of you that this has worked in the coalition's favour, hasn't it :D
  • ILW
    ILW Posts: 18,333 Forumite
    StevieJ wrote: »
    Simple, if it due to be RECEIVED in the current financial year then include , if not then don't.
    That goes against any accounting rules I have seen.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.