We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Rent-related Money-Moral Dilemma...
Comments
-
I just checked with Shelter:
http://england.shelter.org.uk/get_advice/renting_and_leasehold/ending_a_tenancy_or_licence/ending_a_fixed_term_agreement
B is liable all the way!
BOTH A and B are liable! All the way until June.
I would say B should pay the rent until the lease ends (in June, or earlier if they can), but if B has moved out, then (s)he is not liable for any bills.
A and B will both also be liable for any re-letting costs if they terminate the lease before June. And they can only terminate IF the landlord gives them permission.Should've = Should HAVE (not 'of')
Would've = Would HAVE (not 'of')
No, I am not perfect, but yes I do judge people on their use of basic English language. If you didn't know the above, then learn it! (If English is your second language, then you are forgiven!)0 -
I totally agreed with ognum until I you added thisPerson A had originally agreed to see out the tenancy, then realised how much it would cost in reality.
Initially you both signed up for a fixed term, and A and B should both pay their share of the rent while still being held to that term.
Once that term has expired, then if A wants to continue to live in the flat then they would need to pay the full rental cost. Person B should ensure they serve notice and a new tenancy is drawn up just in Person A's name. If this was the plan, then morally Person A should pay the full rent immediately as they have shown they are happy and able to do that once Person B no longer has a legal obligation to.
If on the other hand Person A was just trying to be nice to Person B and not ask for rent for a property they won't be living in, but has now found that they can't afford that, then morally Person B should continue to pay their share of the rent.
PS I like that you've not told us if you are A or B (I assume you are one or the other). Good idea to get an impartial response.Note: Unless otherwise stated, my property related posts refer to England & Wales. Please make sure you state if you are discussing Scotland or elsewhere as laws differ.0 -
Depends on income... when my xbf and I broke up, I contributed as per your scenario because he was not working and had no where to go really.0
-
If B moves out and doesnt pay his share given that A and B both are named on the tenancy agreement, then A will be liable to pay 100% to the landlord.
In this particular case its down to the personal negotiations between A and B.0 -
If B moves out and doesnt pay his share given that A and B both are named on the tenancy agreement, then A will be liable to pay 100% to the landlord.
In this particular case its down to the personal negotiations between A and B.
The landlord could take either/both of them to court for any arrears. Although it will probably be easier for them to chase A because they are actually living at the property and are currently receiving the 'service' as such. However if B earns more money the Landlord may chose B instead. I agree that A and B need to agree between themselves and ensure that the tenancy ends as soon as the fixed term expires.Don't listen to me, I'm no expert!0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
