We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Landlord wants to show people around "All day Wednesday"

2»

Comments

  • G_M
    G_M Posts: 51,977 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    GDB2222 wrote: »
    But G_M, whilst the landlord has a right of entry to repair, and he can bring workmen with him, that does not entitle him to bring prospective tenants with.

    Quite often, tenancies have clauses allowing landlords to bring prospective tenants around during the last month or 2 of the tenancy, subject to reasonable notice. I have never quite understood how that meshes in with the tenant's right to refuse entry. I suspect that the position is probably that the tenant is allowed to refuse entry, but the landlord may be able to sue for damages if there is a void period.
    Not sure I follow why a LL can bring a contractor but not a prospective tenant...? I did not say the LL only had a right of access for repairs. The right of access for viewing purposes is usually contractual, rather than backed up by obligations imposed by statute. In this case, we've not seen the contract of course.

    But even if not written explicitly into the contract, there may be an implied right, especially in a student house where there is a known, annual, turn-around of tenants.

    You are quite right about the problem of 'meshing' the conflicting rights. That is why we have courts - to resolve conflicts.

    As for the LL suing for consequential loss as a result of denial of access, it would come down to 'reasonableness' I suspect. The court would look at the contract; at what notice the LL provided; at whether the tenant had offerred alternatives or refused outright; whether there were other factors (tenant claimed LL had been rude, agressive, threatening etc)

    So I repeat the golden rules here, which apply equally to LL and tenant are

    1) reach an amicable arrangement if at all possible and
    2) put your intentions/conditions/alternatives etc on record in writing
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.6K Life & Family
  • 261.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.