We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Bank Charges not applicable if you're on benefits!

2»

Comments

  • dalesrider
    dalesrider Posts: 3,447 Forumite
    Pandafan wrote: »
    Hi - I've just sent this letter to my bank:


    "My only regular income consists of income-related benefits. (Working and Child Tax Credits, Disability Living Allowance for my son, and Child Benefit.) Therefore, the effect of cancelling an overdraft effectively equates to the appropriation of benefit money, as does applying bank charges for failed payments. You will be aware that this is illegal under the Social Security Administration Act 1992, Section 187, which states:


    . I'll keep you posted!

    I have bolded one of the benefits.

    You pretty much only get this if you or partner are working.... Therefor you have other funds that can be drawn against.
    If wages are going into another banks account and you are trying to use said act to avoid paying charges.... It will not be viewed in a good light. They WILL know you are lieing....

    As other have said, you have it wrong and are on a hiding to nothing.
    Might even mean they close the account. As the banking relationship has broken down.
    Never ASSUME anything its makes a
    >>> A55 of U & ME <<<
  • pmduk
    pmduk Posts: 10,683 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 2 December 2012 at 8:06AM
    How can cancelling an overdraft be considered the appropriation of benefit money? If that were the case nobody on benefits would ever get an overdraft?

    The logical extension of your argument is that any form of repayment to a bank is illegal.

    In your position I'd make sure I have a backup bank account as your existing bank is unlikely to want to continue dealing with you.
  • antrobus
    antrobus Posts: 17,386 Forumite
    If "applying bank charges" amounted to the "appropriation of benefit money" and was contrary to s187 SSAA 1992, it would also mean that applying any kind of charge would similarly be an 'illegal' appropriation of benefit money, which would mean that a bank would not be permitted to apply any debits against benefit funds, which would mean that you would not be able to spend the money.

    I think that would defeat the object of the exercise.
  • Biggles
    Biggles Posts: 8,209 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Trolling ?
  • Your best bet is to open a new basic bank account and arrange for your benefits to be paid there.

    Then negotiate with your existing bank, you are in a much stronger position than relying on this legal argument.

    I do agree with you with regard to your son's DLA - I receive DLA for my son and it is very clear from the information that we received that it is in effect his money, but paid to you as his guardian/parent. However there is no point in getting into an argument with the bank or users of this forum - just open a new account somewhere else!
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.