We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Insurance claim, water damage help

My 81 year old Father's Bathroom was flooded when the overflow pipe failed to do its job. He lives in a Council flat. The water also reached the hall carpet.

When the insurance Assessor came they agreed to replace the ruined underlay in the hall and would send their contractor to dry out the Hall carpet, however the Assessor said the ruined lino in the bathroom was not covered as it was counted as "fixtures and fittings". When I went over to look the lino was a standard off-the-shelf roll held down by carpet tape. Are the inssurers right? Surely its no different to carpet??

Comments

  • clear_blu
    clear_blu Posts: 140 Forumite
    Some insurance assessors and insurance companies have strange ideas as to what comprises 'contents'. I agree with you however, unless stuck to the floor with adhesive, as lino tiles sometimes are, I would class lino as contents.
    I have retired from a career in Financial Services........Thank God. Any advice given may be as a result of senile dementia so dont take it too seriously.......;)
  • mattymoo
    mattymoo Posts: 2,417 Forumite
    Did the council supply the lino? If so, their maintenance dept should sort it out.
  • ssepple
    ssepple Posts: 28 Forumite
    >Did the council supply the lino? If so, their maintenance dept should sort it out.

    No my parents put it in. However the Council were responsible for fitting (or rather, as it turned out mis-fitting) the overflow pipe sometime ago. However my dad has been stonewalled and shuffled around from dept. to dept. when he attempted to see if the Council would accept responsiblity for flood damage.
  • mattymoo
    mattymoo Posts: 2,417 Forumite
    Reason I asked who fitted the lino was some councils provide their homes with no floor coverings. Lessens their responsibility to maintain carpets etc if they do not supply them.

    In that case I would suggest the lino becomes contents. Fixtures and fittings are normally picked up by the insurer of the building (the council or their insurer). Since that is not the case here it must be contents.

    Clarify with your insurers. I am sure this situation with council properties will have cropped up before and an experienced claims handler will sort it out.
  • Ms_Chocaholic
    Ms_Chocaholic Posts: 13,366 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    As the flooring in the bathroom is lino, would this not just dry out?
    Thrifty Till 50 Then Spend Till the End
    You can please some of the people some of the time, all of the people some of the time, some of the people all of the time but you can never please all of the people all of the time
  • FlameCloud
    FlameCloud Posts: 1,952 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Not if the waters got in underneath it, then you have real problems!
  • courtjester
    courtjester Posts: 758 Forumite
    ssepple wrote: »
    >Did the council supply the lino? If so, their maintenance dept should sort it out.

    No my parents put it in.

    If the lino was supplied by your parents, then it is they that own it. The assessor clearly thinks that the lino was part of the premises supplied under the tenancy agreement (in which case it would be classed as landlords fixtures & fittings and part of the flat).

    Your parents need to make clear to the assessor that the lino is (1) their property and (2) not permanently fixed to the floor and hence easily replaceable just like the carpets. It is clearly covered under their contents policy. Sounds like a misunderstanding or assumption on the assessors part.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.2K Life & Family
  • 260.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.