We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Personal Damages
nmcnelis
Posts: 51 Forumite
I'm a financial education worker with Renfrewshire CAB and i commonly help people with their bank charge claims.
I've just had a conversation with a client who is determined to reclaim not only his charges but also damages. I have informed him that a statutory 8% can be added but he is talking about making a claim in the region of £500,000
Obviously this figure is ludicrous but his point is that it would force the bank to show up to court therefore forcing a judgement and setting precedent. I'm assuming that there is some kind of legal reason why this could not happen but not being a legal expert myself i couldn't give him a definite answer.
Was just wondering if anyone could set the record straight on this?
Ta
I've just had a conversation with a client who is determined to reclaim not only his charges but also damages. I have informed him that a statutory 8% can be added but he is talking about making a claim in the region of £500,000
Obviously this figure is ludicrous but his point is that it would force the bank to show up to court therefore forcing a judgement and setting precedent. I'm assuming that there is some kind of legal reason why this could not happen but not being a legal expert myself i couldn't give him a definite answer.
Was just wondering if anyone could set the record straight on this?
Ta
0
Comments
-
I've just had a conversation with a client who is determined to reclaim not only his charges but also damages. I have informed him that a statutory 8% can be added but he is talking about making a claim in the region of £500,000
Obviously this figure is ludicrous but his point is that it would force the bank to show up to court therefore forcing a judgement and setting precedent. I'm assuming that there is some kind of legal reason why this could not happen but not being a legal expert myself i couldn't give him a definite answer.
If the claim was being made for that amount, it's unlikely the bank would settle out of court.
The judge would require evidence of how these damages are composed and how they relate to the charges. It's unlikely the claimant would be able to provide these and the case would probably not go any further.
Even if by some long shot, he won or the bank paid up, this would not set a precedent in the County Court.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards