We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Guarantor for rent

Hi there. I'm about to move into a rented flat and have been told I need to supply a guarantor rather than pay a bond. This isn't a problem as my dad is going to do it for me as he is a home owner. But he did have a very good question and its probably a very simple answer. How will my landlord know hes a homeowner? And also why would my landlord want a guarantor and not a bond? I have a good job and have never been in debt.

Comments

  • G_M
    G_M Posts: 51,977 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    1) your dad will need to be credit vetted by the landlord in the same way that tenants are. If he had no income, no owned-home, or had bankruptcy history etc, he would be rejected as a guarantor

    2) it is unusual not to require a bond (deposit). A guarantor is not a substitute for a deposit, but is a substitute for a tenant who fails the credit vetting (eg history of debts, no income etc)

    3) if YOU are a good 'risk' and pass the credit vetting (good job, good financial history), there is normally no need for a guarantor.

    4) my guess is that this LL wants to avoid having to place a deposit in an approved registered deposit scheme. I see no advantage in this (to you or the LL)

    5)but it does ring a slight alarm bell - a LL who is so reluctant to place a deposit in a scheme may have other reasons - avoiding tax so wants to avoid official paperwork? What ELSE is he avoiding?

    Pay £3 to the Land Registry here, and download the property Title. Look at section 3 (Charges Register). Is there a bank registered with a Charge? This is a mortgage. If yes, ask the landlord to confirm he has the bank's permission to let the property out?
  • It's a private let, not through an estate agent so I haven't been credit checked. He said something about giving whatever forms my dad signs to his solicitor. My dad has never been in debt, is a homeowner and has a very well paid job. Just all seems a bit strange this method. Surely I could have asked anyone to be my guarantor and pretended they were a homeowner and had a well paid job!
  • G_M
    G_M Posts: 51,977 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    jimlufc wrote: »
    It's a private let, not through an estate agent so I haven't been credit checked. He said something about giving whatever forms my dad signs to his solicitor. My dad has never been in debt, is a homeowner and has a very well paid job. Just all seems a bit strange this method. Surely I could have asked anyone to be my guarantor and pretended they were a homeowner and had a well paid job!

    Many LL's do not use agents, but most of them (like myself) still do credit checks!

    Yes, you could give any name - but whoever signs the documents and becomes guarantor becomes legally responsible for your debts in the tenancy (rent, damage etc).

    Not even credit checking you is a bad sign - this LL is a muppet! I would rent elsewhere. Have you paid him anything yet (holding deposit etc)?

    Or just say your dad is not willing to take on the very real responsibility of being guarantor (you could say he wants you to stand on your own two feet!) so you'd prefer to pay a deposit. And offer to be credit checked: costs £15 - £40 eg here.

    Perfectly reasonable.
  • I haven't paid him anything yet thankfully, but he is wanting £100 for the guarantor. Not sure exactly what that will be for!
  • Fire_Fox
    Fire_Fox Posts: 26,026 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    jimlufc wrote: »
    It's a private let, not through an estate agent so I haven't been credit checked. He said something about giving whatever forms my dad signs to his solicitor. My dad has never been in debt, is a homeowner and has a very well paid job. Just all seems a bit strange this method. Surely I could have asked anyone to be my guarantor and pretended they were a homeowner and had a well paid job!

    I haven't paid him anything yet thankfully, but he is wanting £100 for the guarantor. Not sure exactly what that will be for!

    G_M just told you twice that your guarantor should be credit checked - they will be able to see the mortgage, ergo it's a safe bet your father is a homeowner!

    Ask your new landlord to confirm in writing that he has either a buy to let mortgage or consent to lease from his lender or owns outright. It's unusual not to take a damage deposit nor credit check the tenant and makes me wonder if he is trying to keep under the radar.
    Declutterbug-in-progress.⭐️⭐️⭐️ ⭐️⭐️
  • tbs624
    tbs624 Posts: 10,816 Forumite
    G_M wrote: »
    1) your dad will need to be credit vetted by the landlord in the same way that tenants are. If he had no income, no owned-home, or had bankruptcy history etc, he would be rejected as a guarantor
    My bolding. Plenty of people get to act as guarantors for others without being OOs so rejection is not a given purely on that ground.
  • G_M
    G_M Posts: 51,977 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    tbs624 wrote: »
    My bolding. Plenty of people get to act as guarantors for others without being OOs so rejection is not a given purely on that ground.
    True.

    However I did not mean to make definitive statements about what passes/fails credit checks - I was giving examples in order to make the more general points that

    a) most LL's/agents perform checks on guarantors
    b) if a guarantor does not meet the LL's criteria during the check, then they will not be accepted as guarantors

    The OP appeared to not realise either of these two points.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.