We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Inflation will rise faster than expected
Comments
-
JonnyBravo wrote: »Well more broad brush strokes and I'd like to be noted as an exception once again.
I took a fixed rate offset for 10 years over 4 years ago from FD. A poor decision (so far) it turns out as the flexible offset would have saved me money (so far).
Not terrible though as it used for BTL purposes so at least it saves me paying so much tax.
It is at times entirely offest and at others only minimally as the money is used to trade/invest in shares.
People often forget when their fixed rate is higher than variable mortgages, that the primary reason for getting a fix is security. Security of knowing exactly what they will pay for their accommodation for the term of the fix.
Saying that, with the current market leading 10 year fix at 4.58%, it's difficult to see how you'd lose out financially over a 10 year period.0 -
Eellogofusciouhipoppokunu wrote: »People often forget when their fixed rate is higher than variable mortgages, that the primary reason for getting a fix is security. Security of knowing exactly what they will pay for their accommodation for the term of the fix.
Saying that, with the current market leading 10 year fix at 4.58%, it's difficult to see how you'd lose out financially over a 10 year period.
Absolutely and that is of course the chief reason we took that mortgage then. Since then our finances have changed immeasurably and ultimately we could always pay 2% to escape.0 -
the reason that people say inflation is a solution to debt is because historically price inflation has been closely related to wage inflation.
Wage inflation on the whole exceeded price inflation.
This was down to productivity improvements ( i.e. technology).
Still remember getting a 21% pay rise when inflation was 18.5%. That was the time to be geared up with debt.
There's no apparent productivity gains in the wider economy currently. So hard to see real wage rises for many.0 -
Thrugelmir wrote: »Wage inflation on the whole exceeded price inflation.
This was down to productivity improvements ( i.e. technology).
Still remember getting a 21% pay rise when inflation was 18.5%. That was the time to be geared up with debt.
There's no apparent productivity gains in the wider economy currently. So hard to see real wage rises for many.
indeed so
for the 50 years before the financial meltdown wages rose abour 2-3% pa more than prices.
however, as far as debt being eroded by inflation, the important factor in wage inflation rather than price inflation or real increase in productivity0 -
Wages up 1.8% last year.
Merv now says price inflation will start to come down again in the 2nd half of 2013.
GDP growth forecast for 2013 reduced to around 1%. Last quarter was a flash in the pan - at last something to blame on the Olympics.
Recovery now "slow and protracted"."It will take, five, 10, 15 years to get back to where we need to be. But it's no longer the individual banks that are in the wrong, it's the banking industry as a whole." - Steven Cooper, head of personal and business banking at Barclays, talking to Martin Lewis0 -
That bloke from the BOE never resigned....0
-
Graham_Devon wrote: »That bloke from the BOE never resigned....
I remember seeing an article about this. Are there any real quotes attributable to him where he says that if inflation isn't x% by a specified date then he'd resign?
I thought he said he said he wouldn't seek re-election to the MPC rather than resign.
If he's made a clear statement I don't mind sending him a letter reminding him of his commitment. Suggest you too if you're really bothered.0 -
I remember seeing an article about this. Are there any real quotes attributable to him where he says that if inflation isn't x% by a specified date then he'd resign?
I thought he said he said he wouldn't seek re-election to the MPC rather than resign.
If he's made a clear statement I don't mind sending him a letter reminding him of his commitment. Suggest you too if you're really bothered.
No, you are right. He said he wouldn't seek a second term.
And to be fair to him, he hasn't done and is now gone. Inflation was supposed to be well below target by now, and he talked of sleepless nights worrying about his participation in increased inflation.0 -
Graham_Devon wrote: »No, you are right. He said he wouldn't seek a second term.
And to be fair to him, he hasn't done and is now gone. Inflation was supposed to be well below target by now, and he talked of sleepless nights worrying about his participation in increased inflation.
Years of low inflation and he's losing sleep about the difference between inflation of what? 2% and 2.5%?
Not sure he was dealing with the pressure very well by the sounds of it. Perhaps he was deluding himself by thinking he could fine tune inflation.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards