PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Estate agent To Let signs / boards

Options
2»

Comments

  • Close to me an estate agent nailed a board to the pillar of a brand-new brick wall neighbouring the property for sale. If I was the neighbour I'd be fuming. Most estate agents near me contract out the boards to a sign agency but their fixing methods are crude to say the least, and unlawful/criminal at their worst. The regulations state "Any board advertising property for sale or to let must be displayed on the property to which it relates".
  • Davesnave
    Davesnave Posts: 34,741 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    The regulations state "Any board advertising property for sale or to let must be displayed on the property to which it relates".

    That could be difficult for the 15 or so properties which are my 'neighbours,' albeit 100metres or more down a track. Their piece of owned roadway ends short of the public road, so technically they could not advertise.

    In the real world, the sign board people use the council verge, but not the one in front of my house, because if the sign goes there, it mysteriously ends up in the hedge a day or so later! ;)
  • Fire_Fox wrote: »
    Cheeky beggars! Note that verbal contracts are still contracts, but I assume you did not agree verbally to having a sign bolted to the building or you would not have posted.

    No agreement at all regarding a sign. They've bolted it into original 1930's woodwork :/
  • Werdnal
    Werdnal Posts: 3,780 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    edited 6 November 2012 at 11:57AM
    Davesnave wrote: »
    Bear in mind that some agents do not erect their own signs, but use a third party, who may deal with signs for a number of local agents. It's certainly the case where I live.

    Doesn't excuse the agents from liability for their tradesman erecting an unauthorised sign and damaging the property to boot. OP should take it up with the agent, agent should take it up with their sub-contractor. Sub-contractor is not working for the OP!

    One of the sign erectors our local group of agents uses looks about 12, surprised he's even old enough to have a driving license. He tried to nail a "for sale" sign on the wooden wall-mounted entrance board on a block of flats, and pulled the whole entrance board down (it was my flat they were trying to sell). Freeholder went absolutely ballistic, but successfully sued them for price of a brand new entrance board. I went up the following day myself with a for sale board, checked with freeholder and fitted it to the outside wall with 2 masonary nails, no visible damage at all and in a much more prominant place than the original!

    Same guy put up a board in my MIL's neighbours garden - she watched him and said he literally pushed it into the ground, no hammer, no stake and it blew over in a light breeze the same day. If the agents want to present a professional service, they should not employ cowboys to work on their behalf!
  • Davesnave wrote: »
    That could be difficult for the 15 or so properties which are my 'neighbours,' albeit 100metres or more down a track. Their piece of owned roadway ends short of the public road, so technically they could not advertise.

    In the real world, the sign board people use the council verge, but not the one in front of my house, because if the sign goes there, it mysteriously ends up in the hedge a day or so later! ;)
    Strictly speaking, no, they couldn't. The council could choose to enforce the regulations but in practice most choose to turn a blind eye. You should also only have one board per property but I've seen as many as three agents' boards outside.
  • AlexMac
    AlexMac Posts: 3,064 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Its easy to be wise after the event, but I've only learned from experience to specify 'No boards' when contacting (orally or in writing) with letting agents (or come to that, when selling). The trouble is, letting agents see these as free publicity so are desparate to get them up. One local agent really irritates me by sticking them on the communal areas of housing estates or larger multi-occupied blocks and leaving them there for months, I'm sure, in defiance of the regs.

    And to rub salt in the wounds - when our kids sold (STC) the other day, the agent slapped a SOLD sign up without permission, while they were away for the weekend househunting for the new one- which might, or might not have been a trigger for the theft of the pots and planters we'd loaned them as a cynical bit of kerb-appeal window-dressing! Still- bless- they got a good price and if people are so scammy they're prepared to nick a few quids worth of plants, we just have to move on...

    And it would be cynical of me to object wholesale to SALE or LET boards. We loved living on an estate which banned them til a year ago but only discovered our new dream home by chance when driving past the ENORMOUS (and probably illegal) pair of SALE signs just outside our area of online searching
  • Fire_Fox
    Fire_Fox Posts: 26,026 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Davesnave wrote: »
    Bear in mind that some agents do not erect their own signs, but use a third party, who may deal with signs for a number of local agents. It's certainly the case where I live.

    It's not beyond the whit of man to communicate with the chosen company and ask them to only use cable ties or not to screw/ bolt/ nail them to pieces of wood/ concrete/ stone or only on fences but not buildings themselves.

    The other culprit is Sky. We have a couple of dishes that breach covenants in the long lease attached to the back of our building. I doubt they will be paying to repair the blown render or frost damage to bricks, should they cause any problems. :mad:
    Declutterbug-in-progress.⭐️⭐️⭐️ ⭐️⭐️
  • Davesnave
    Davesnave Posts: 34,741 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Werdnal wrote: »
    Doesn't excuse the agents from liability for their tradesman erecting an unauthorised sign and damaging the property to boot. OP should take it up with the agent, agent should take it up with their sub-contractor. Sub-contractor is not working for the OP!

    Far from suggesting that the legal position is other than you say, I was just pointing out that the guys in the office may well be one step removed from the erection process, if you'll pardon the expression. This might influence the OP's initial approach to them. ;)
    Fire_Fox wrote: »
    It's not beyond the whit of man to communicate with the chosen company and ask them to only use cable ties or not to screw/ bolt/ nail them to pieces of wood/ concrete/ stone or only on fences but not buildings themselves.

    I'm sure it isn't, but again, I'm not making apologies for anyone carrying out work in a foolish or thoughtless manner.
  • chris_m
    chris_m Posts: 8,250 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Fire_Fox wrote: »
    The other culprit is Sky. We have a couple of dishes that breach covenants in the long lease attached to the back of our building. I doubt they will be paying to repair the blown render or frost damage to bricks, should they cause any problems. :mad:

    No, the tenants/leaseholders should pay - you can hardly expect a Sky installer to have a knowledge of customer's leases.
  • googler
    googler Posts: 16,103 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    AlexMac wrote: »
    One local agent really irritates me by sticking them on the communal areas of housing estates or larger multi-occupied blocks ...

    ..presumably whilst acting for one of the communal owners of said area?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.