We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Negative Equity -v- Renting
Comments
-
BTW, as someone who lived through the last property crash, whilst it is true that neg equity is only a problem if you have to sell, in a property crash there are lots of forced sellers due to everyone being sacked! Where I worked in 1989, 80% were made redundant. This is because, when property prices fall, people don't feel rich any more (the dinner party bores), they tighten their belts, no-one buys anything, so no-one sells anything so.....I had just bought my first property and would have lost 30% of its value if I had not been one of the lucky ones who kept their jobs. I rode it out and it took 12 years to get back what I paid for that property. But £140k is virtually free these days, so in the OP's location I would buy. Hey, if I can rent it out for £750 pcm, maybe I'll buy one as an investment!0
-
Bukup- If your REPAYMENT mortgage + maintenance costs + insurance premiums are less than the rent then I'd say go for it. Don't forget the initial costs of buying (SDLT, solicitors etc) will be about 5k on top of 140K.
The 'Dead money' arguement is well known but the example you use in your OP only really applies if you buy in cash rather than with a mortgage but even then you would have to figure in what that cash might otherwise be earning you in the way of interest which may more than cover the rent....
If you are comfortable with your repayments, are looking for a home rather than an investment and have a recession proof income then you'll be fine.0 -
And buy a property that has enough rooms for you to be able to take in a lodger if the worst happens - it could save the roof over your head.0
-
I am puzzled by your figures, although house prices are high in Christchurch, rental yields are pretty low. So are you buying a similar standard of property to the one you are renting? I would expect to pay 750pcm rent for a property worth £220K or so, not one worth £140k.
Rental yields are nearer 4% than your 6.5% and there is very little you can buy for £140k.
Finally as jaype has pointed out you need to take account of the interest you pay on your mortgage loan, that disapears just like rent does.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
