We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Insurance costs set to soar for females as EU Gender Directive comes in to force

(Apologies in advance if this has been previously mentioned on another thread).

Currently, some forms of insurance are cheaper for women however from 21st December 2012 when the EU Gender Directive comes into force, insurers will no longer be permitted to use gender as a means to differentiate premiums between men and women.

Typically women currently pay lower for their life insurance costs but with the implementation of the Gender Directive, whilst taking into account estimates by HM Treasury, women’s premiums could go up by as much as 15%. Women are likely to be worst affected, with Car Insurance premiums and Life Insurance premiums set to rise sharply.

The Directive will also have an impact on males; Until 21 December 2012 men are entitled to higher private pension incomes (annuities) than women as statistically women live longer, meaning their pension income has to stretch further.

After 21st December, male and female annuity rates will be equalised thanks to the Gender Directive. Therefore men wishing to buy their annuity rates this year need to act sooner rather than later in order to take advantage of the current higher male annuity rates – this will not affect existing annuities in payment.

For females, the best way minimalize the potential cost is to review your Insurance arrangements or lack thereof, before the ruling comes into effect. Life Insurance becomes more expensive the older you are when it is taken out, so acting now you could save money regardless of the EU Gender Directive.

For males, it is more important than ever to shop around for the best deal to boost your retirement income. In addition, men should consider putting income protection arrangements in place before December as costs are likely to increase.


What's your views on using gender as a means to differentiate premiums between men and women?

Comments

  • ACG
    ACG Posts: 24,735 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper I've helped Parliament
    Its not just car insurance, its life insurance, health insurance i think also pensions are affected also.

    I personally think its rediculous, if im more likely to have a crash, die, become ill because of my sex then i expect to pay more - because the risk is higher. I might not be happy but it makes perfect sense - to do it the way it has gone doesnt make anyone happy and it also makes very little sense.

    I pay more in insurance than my dad - do i say thats ageist? no!
    I am a Mortgage Adviser
    You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a mortgage adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.
  • rudekid48
    rudekid48 Posts: 2,382 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts
    Age "discrimination" will be next............watch this space :D
    All matter is merely energy condensed to a slow vibration, we are all one consciousness experiencing itself subjectively, there is no such thing as death, life is only a dream, and we are the imagination of ourselves.
  • I always thought this was a bad decision. Insurers have been charging men more for insurance as they have something like a billion policy years worth of data which tells them that men generally cost more to insure; they're not being charged more out of misandry which would be a legitimate human rights case.

    Men simply costing more might be an inconvenient truth in certain quarters but the gender directive means that half of society will be paying too much and the other half too little. That doesn't seem fair to me!
  • vaio
    vaio Posts: 12,287 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    surely anything that allows insurers to tailor a policy more closely to the individual must be a good thing?

    I thought all the gender directive was doing was stopping insurers assuming boys are bad/girls are good until the boy or girl concerned had proved they were good or bad via their driving/claims record?

    Bit of an emotive thread title, (lifted from the daily mail?) how about "insurance costs set to be slashed for males when EU gender directive comes in" or even "EU forces British Insurers to get in line with the rest of civilised society and stop discriminating on gender"?
  • rudekid48
    rudekid48 Posts: 2,382 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts
    vaio wrote: »
    surely anything that allows insurers to tailor a policy more closely to the individual must be a good thing?

    I thought all the gender directive was doing was stopping insurers assuming boys are bad/girls are good until the boy or girl concerned had proved they were good or bad via their driving/claims record?

    Bit of an emotive thread title, (lifted from the daily mail?) how about "insurance costs set to be slashed for males when EU gender directive comes in" or even "EU forces British Insurers to get in line with the rest of civilised society and stop discriminating on gender"?

    A nice idea but that is not what is going to happen, the vast majority of Insurers have simply put the female rates up to match males.
    All matter is merely energy condensed to a slow vibration, we are all one consciousness experiencing itself subjectively, there is no such thing as death, life is only a dream, and we are the imagination of ourselves.
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 120,346 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    There are already suggestions in the industry that unisex pricing is already fully priced in or mostly there in some product areas.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.