We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Capital One PPI 1999 - "Short Application Form"
cjm28
Posts: 5 Forumite
All,
My request to a refund of PPI payments and interest going back to June 1999 has been rejected by Capital One. They have provided a copy of my postal application, a "Short Application Form", which has my name and address printed. The application has a section where it states:
"Please enrol me in Capital One's Payment Protection scheme" with a Yes or No box. The Yes box has been ticked while the No box is completely blanked out; like it has been entirely filled in by marker. I suspect the application form has been amended after I submitted it. In addition, the ink and style of the tick in the Yes box appears to be different from the rest of the application (possibly a thiner pen).
In their response to me they have not acknowledged that the No box had marker over it. They state: "The application form gives two opetions regarding the addition of the PPI policy. The boxes are clearly marked 'yes' or 'no'. Therefore, you had the choice to tick either box and the PPI was only added because you selected 'yes'. If you had ticked the box marked no or left this blank, the PPI would not have been applied to you account. We have never pre-populated or automatically completed tick boxes on our application forms and continue not to do so."
They have also said that they send me a copy of the PPI policy after it was taken out. I do not recall this happening.
I have uploaded an image of part of the application here:
i47 . tinypic .com /wm0ze1.jpg
(Sorry, less than 10 posts so I can't post the link or picture directly. Please delete the 4 spaces in the above link.)
Is it me or does something not look quite right with this? I do not recognise the signiture on the left, presumably it is the Capital One underwriter. I did note that it was a finer pen than I had used though, similar to the Yes tick. I intend to write back and point out the unusual No box. Any thoughts or advice would be gratefully recieved.
Thanks
Chris
My request to a refund of PPI payments and interest going back to June 1999 has been rejected by Capital One. They have provided a copy of my postal application, a "Short Application Form", which has my name and address printed. The application has a section where it states:
"Please enrol me in Capital One's Payment Protection scheme" with a Yes or No box. The Yes box has been ticked while the No box is completely blanked out; like it has been entirely filled in by marker. I suspect the application form has been amended after I submitted it. In addition, the ink and style of the tick in the Yes box appears to be different from the rest of the application (possibly a thiner pen).
In their response to me they have not acknowledged that the No box had marker over it. They state: "The application form gives two opetions regarding the addition of the PPI policy. The boxes are clearly marked 'yes' or 'no'. Therefore, you had the choice to tick either box and the PPI was only added because you selected 'yes'. If you had ticked the box marked no or left this blank, the PPI would not have been applied to you account. We have never pre-populated or automatically completed tick boxes on our application forms and continue not to do so."
They have also said that they send me a copy of the PPI policy after it was taken out. I do not recall this happening.
I have uploaded an image of part of the application here:
i47 . tinypic .com /wm0ze1.jpg
(Sorry, less than 10 posts so I can't post the link or picture directly. Please delete the 4 spaces in the above link.)
Is it me or does something not look quite right with this? I do not recognise the signiture on the left, presumably it is the Capital One underwriter. I did note that it was a finer pen than I had used though, similar to the Yes tick. I intend to write back and point out the unusual No box. Any thoughts or advice would be gratefully recieved.
Thanks
Chris
0
Comments
-
"Please enrol me in Capital One's Payment Protection scheme" with a Yes or No box. The Yes box has been ticked while the No box is completely blanked out; like it has been entirely filled in by marker. I suspect the application form has been amended after I submitted it.
That is a serious accusation of fraud. Two issues there:
1 - what evidence do you have to support your allegation.
2 - if that was the case then why has it taken you over 13 years to report it?I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0 -
I have to be honest and say I think you're grasping at straws here. Do you truly believe you are going to have a complaint of fraud against you upheld by the Bank because "something does not look quite right with this"?Any thoughts or advice would be gratefully received.
Complain of mis-selling to the Bank. Serious complaints about fraud (with evidence, of course) should go to the Police.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards