We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
The MSE Forum Team would like to wish you all a Merry Christmas. However, we know this time of year can be difficult for some. If you're struggling during the festive period, here's a list of organisations that might be able to help
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
cop pointing speedgun on motorway
Comments
-
there are much safer ways to control speeds, i remember reading a long time ago some country where they displayed a upset smiley face on a dot matrix screen above the lane where cars were speeding. it has a draws huge psychological responses and forces drivers to slow down.
where cars were driving at reasonable speeds, they received positive encouragement and got a smile.
speed traps are not about road safty or congestion easing at all, they're all about revenue generation. speed traps are dangerous, I've been on many roads where everyone is speeding during rush hour and then the dreaded dotted lines occur on the road and everyone slows down. some have to slam on their brakes and cause a near pile up.0 -
You sure it wasnt the village idiot in a flourescent vest trying to dry the motorway with his hairdryer..?0
-
Should probably add something useful to this discussion.
A number on the display of a hand held speed gun proves absolutely nothing other than some arbitrary object had some component of it's velocity vector measured within some accuracy of the displayed number.
So if you find yourself pulled over and facing such 'evidence'; consider politely declining any offer of a fixed penalty notice.
The earlier comments about deserving it if actually being stopped have a degree of merit though; traffic police tend to apply a lot more discretion than just the arbitrarily low national speed limit.0 -
It's called EnglandlondonTiger wrote: »there are much safer ways to control speeds, i remember reading a long time ago some country where they displayed a upset smiley face on a dot matrix screen above the lane where cars were speeding. it has a draws huge psychological responses and forces drivers to slow down.
There's one in Blackheath for a start (if you ever make it through the Blackwall Tunnel).
I think they have a part to play when people don't realise they have drifted over a 20 or 30 limit but not much to those who don't care or think having a faster car exempts them from the rules.I need to think of something new here...0 -
There's a section of the A55 running through the town of Colwyn Bay were the speed limit drops from 70mph to 50mph for a distance of about three miles (apparently because the slip roads along that stretch are too short and speaking from experience it certainly can be hairy trying to merge into the main of traffic at times). This section of road opened about 25 years ago and the 50mph was never really enforced until the police started a campaign at the beginning of this month. In the first three weeks they're reported to have caught 700 offenders, not just speeding but also people using mobiles phones, eating and not wearing seatbelts.
I know they have had officers stood on a bridge with cameras as I doubt they've have the manpower available to pull over 700 people in such a short space of time I assume they can "convict" using the cameras. Clearly the cameras are also capable of taking close up photos if they can catch people on phones, etc.
Incidentally a lot of people, myself included, are glad the police are acting this way as it's not uncommon to see idiots flying through the 50mph stretch at 80mph+ so this crackdown by the police is long overdue.
http://www.dailypost.co.uk/news/north-wales-news/2012/10/22/700-caught-speeding-on-a55-at-colwyn-bay-in-three-weeks-55578-32079601/The fridge is empty, the walls are damp, there's no hot water
And I look like a tramp and tramps like us
Baby we were born to walk0 -
I hear about it on forums much more often than I've experienced it. Every time I have used it it gives a completely expected reading. Not to say it can never happen, but if the units are used properly (which is not at all difficult) there should be no likelihood of a misread.
I wouldn't take much notice of brat. He tries to make out that he is a traffic police officer, but his posts in other threads have proven that he has very little grasp of the highway code, or road traffic law. Personally I think he is another armchair expert.0 -
-
thenudeone wrote: »Was it really a hand held gun? Or was it a laser device (with video film) on a tripod being pointed by hand, in which case everyone who has been targeted with the laser and over 10%+2mph over the limit will get a NIP in the post once the video is reviewed (or possibly a speed awareness course offer). It's quite possible to target every car going past - there's usually two seconds between each car - that's enough time to take a reading and move to the next car.
And these are the type of cameras that are usually in vans (that brat thinks don't exist). :rotfl:0 -
londonTiger wrote: »there are much safer ways to control speeds, i remember reading a long time ago some country where they displayed a upset smiley face on a dot matrix screen above the lane where cars were speeding. it has a draws huge psychological responses and forces drivers to slow down.
where cars were driving at reasonable speeds, they received positive encouragement and got a smile.
I've seen those in this country. I can't remember where though.londonTiger wrote: »speed traps are not about road safty or congestion easing at all, they're all about revenue generation. speed traps are dangerous, I've been on many roads where everyone is speeding during rush hour and then the dreaded dotted lines occur on the road and everyone slows down. some have to slam on their brakes and cause a near pile up.
So not only were they speeding, but they were also either driving too close, or driving without due care and attention.
So is it the speed cameras that are dangerous, or the drivers?0 -
There's a section of the A55 running through the town of Colwyn Bay were the speed limit drops from 70mph to 50mph for a distance of about three miles (apparently because the slip roads along that stretch are too short and speaking from experience it certainly can be hairy trying to merge into the main of traffic at times). This section of road opened about 25 years ago and the 50mph was never really enforced until the police started a campaign at the beginning of this month. In the first three weeks they're reported to have caught 700 offenders, not just speeding but also people using mobiles phones, eating and not wearing seatbelts.
I know they have had officers stood on a bridge with cameras as I doubt they've have the manpower available to pull over 700 people in such a short space of time I assume they can "convict" using the cameras. Clearly the cameras are also capable of taking close up photos if they can catch people on phones, etc.
Incidentally a lot of people, myself included, are glad the police are acting this way as it's not uncommon to see idiots flying through the 50mph stretch at 80mph+ so this crackdown by the police is long overdue.
http://www.dailypost.co.uk/news/north-wales-news/2012/10/22/700-caught-speeding-on-a55-at-colwyn-bay-in-three-weeks-55578-32079601/
They probably used the tripod mounted cameras in vans, as these actually record (unlike the handheld ones).0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.7K Spending & Discounts
- 246K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.8K Life & Family
- 259.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
