We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices

In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

What if economists were personally liable for their advice

Generali · 2012-10-10 09:21:40

I think I might have found something in the Interwebs that both Graham_Devon and HAMISH_MACTAVISH can agree on! http://bilbo.economicoutlook.net/blog/?p=16609 (continues) I can't say I agree with this writer but it's interesting stuff, to me at least.

Comments

A._Badger Posts: 5,881 Forumite

12 October 2012 at 9:41PM

Quite right, dunstonh - and woe betide anyone foolish enough to think that adding the word 'computer' to models of chaotic systems makes them any more accurate.

0