We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
What if economists were personally liable for their advice
Generali
Posts: 36,411 Forumite
I think I might have found something in the Interwebs that both Graham_Devon and HAMISH_MACTAVISH can agree on!
http://bilbo.economicoutlook.net/blog/?p=16609
(continues)
I can't say I agree with this writer but it's interesting stuff, to me at least.
http://bilbo.economicoutlook.net/blog/?p=16609
Economists have a strange way of writing up briefing documents. There is an advanced capacity to dehumanise economic advice and ignore the most important economic and social problems (unemployment and poverty) in favour of promoting non-issues (like public debt ratios). It reminds me sometimes of how the Nazis who were brutal in the extreme in the execution of their ideology sat around getting portraits of themselves taken with their loving families etc. The training of economists creates an advanced state of separation from human issues and an absence of empathy. Such is the case in a October 21, 2011 document – Greece: Debt Sustainability Analysis – which is labelled STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL by its authors and was intended as input to the upcoming meeting of the Eurozone leaders – which is in fact the EU/ECB/IMF – aka and hereafter referred to as the “Troika”. As I read the document – in all its luridly obscene detail – I wondered what if economists were personally liable for their advice? The jails would be full of bankrupted economists. I am sure that the Troika economists would plead “only following orders” but then we have heard that before too.
(continues)
I can't say I agree with this writer but it's interesting stuff, to me at least.
0
Comments
-
Godwin's law in the 3rd sentence? Some kind of record surely?0
-
brokenarrow wrote: »Ben Bernake would have lost his job long ago, he has been wrong pretty much 100% of the time.
What else should he have done/done differently do you think?0 -
brokenarrow wrote: »Not abused/expanded the currency supply so extremely he has killed the dollar there is no saving it now.
The dollar isn't dead, it still buys much the same number of Pounds as it did in the mid-nineties.0 -
0 -
brokenarrow wrote: »All currencies are in free fall together its a race to the bottom.
I mean there is no saving the dollar now, its going to die this last QE was QE to infinity, until the dollar is dead.
I think we need a tumbleweed smilieChuck Norris can kill two stones with one birdThe only time Chuck Norris was wrong was when he thought he had made a mistakeChuck Norris puts the "laughter" in "manslaughter".I've started running again, after several injuries had forced me to stop0 -
I was looking back at IMF predictions from the last few years. Pretty much always wrong. In early 2008 for example they stated the global Banking issues would likely be offset by falling oil prices and soon return the world economy to norm!
My issue with economists is that they;
1) Tend to be a bit out of touch - for example they won't meet small builders and black cabies that are in fact quite a useful barometer
2) They rely on offical clumsy stats that are always backwards looking
3) They extrapolate in smooth lines from a current scene
4) They pay no attention to subbtle Human change factors, for example they ignored the rise of the green revolution in 1970 which transformed crop yields over night and at a stroke made all thier world famine predictions obsolete (of course quietly forgotten by them)
I say in all seriousness that I have found wiley old self employed builders to be MUCH more reliable when it comes to predicting.
It was people like that in 2005 that would say to me off the cuff that there was no point buying as a big crash was going to happen. How is it these ignoramouses seem always to have thier finger on the pulse? BTW, many of them now tell me things have picked up markedly.0 -
How can anyone predict things when people (aka governments) jump in and mess things up?0
-
Then what is the point of being an economist? If you can't make decent predictions (superior to the man in the street) then would anyone notice if they were all sacked? This profession has been sucking in money from institutions for years despite there being no scientific basis to back up their conclusions.
Surely they cannot believe their luck that they have been getting away with it for so long(a bit like weather forecasters).
They probably would be unemployable for any other job in my opinion.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
