We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
GCSE Maths question - Help...?
Options
Comments
-
I found it a very useful example of how maths can be applied to real life.:heartsmil When you find people who not only tolerate your quirks but celebrate them with glad cries of "Me too!" be sure to cherish them. Because these weirdos are your true family.0
-
stamina9008 wrote: »Hi, my dad uses this site but i thought it might be a good place to ask this question..
Please help me answer it, it's part of my homework and i cant understand it..
I dont think the answer is 3/5, so..please help..
4. Challenge!
Simon ate 1/5 of a cake and his sister ate 1/4 of what was left.
What fraction of the cake is now left? (hint: a diagram may help!)
I understand the four rules of fractions, but this question is really annoying me..
Have a nice day
I understand how annoying some mathematical problems can be to solve, but there is a hint in the question to help you
So lets use that hint and start by dividing a cake (or a pie as mathematicans always prefer!) into 5 equal pieces.
Now if Simon eats a piece, the remainder will look like this:
If Simon's sister now eats a quarter of this, the remaining cake will look like this:
Which obviously leaves 3/5 of the original cake remaining0 -
Oh goody, perhaps you could supply the answer to this little question I have for my assignment
The trench is a "truncated pyramid"
Area = Area of a trapezium * length = 1/2(a+b)hl
a = 11 1/2
b = 3 1/2
h = 4
l = 140
Area = 1/2(11 1/2 + 3 1/2)* 4 * 140
Area = 8,400 cu ft.
Area of Cylinder = Pie * r squared * h (or in this case l)
Area = 22/7 * 3/4 squared * 140
Area = 247.50
Rubble required = 8,400 - 247.50
Rubble required = 8,152.50 cu ft.
Weight = 28 tonnes = 551.155655462194 cwt
1 cu ft. = 0.037037037 cu yds
8,152.50 cu ft. = 301.9444 cu yds
weight of 1 cu yd = 301.9444 / 551.155655462194
Weight = 1.82535451853547
Weight = 1.8 cwt to the nearest tenth of a cwt0 -
-
LittleVoice wrote: »Could I hazard a guess that that is part of a question from a GCE 'O'level paper from the 1960s?
11 plus, 1954 :rotfl:0 -
The trench is a "truncated pyramid"
Area = Area of a trapezium * length = 1/2(a+b)hl
a = 11 1/2
b = 3 1/2
h = 4
l = 140
Area = 1/2(11 1/2 + 3 1/2)* 4 * 140
Area = 8,400 cu ft.
Area of Cylinder = Pie * r squared * h (or in this case l)
Area = 22/7 * 3/4 squared * 140
Area = 247.50
Rubble required = 8,400 - 247.50
Rubble required = 8,152.50 cu ft.
Weight = 28 tonnes = 551.155655462194 cwt
1 cu ft. = 0.037037037 cu yds
8,152.50 cu ft. = 301.9444 cu yds
weight of 1 cu yd = 301.9444 / 551.155655462194
Weight = 1.82535451853547
Weight = 1.8 cwt to the nearest tenth of a cwt
Wow! That much? :eek:
I'm glad you don't work in our building company - we'll be bust by the end of the month if we went ordering that amount of rubble.
Put the calculator down and think about the answer a little.
The trench is 4 ft deep and, on average, less than 3ft wide.
So lets assume, roughly, 10 cubic foot per foot of length to keep the numbers simple.
Now the length is 140ft.
So I would expect the total excavated volume to only be about 1400 cu.ft.
Then there's the volume of the pipe to deduct, so an answer about 1150 cu.ft is what I would be expecting.
But what do I know? I'm just a poor navvy.
Btw, there were only 20 cwt to a ton when I went to school
Perhaps you've allowed for inflation?0 -
Wow! That much? :eek:
I'm glad you don't work in our building company - we'll be bust by the end of the month if we went ordering that amount of rubble.
Put the calculator down and think about the answer a little.
The trench is 4 ft deep and, on average, less than 3ft wide.
So lets assume, roughly, 10 cubic foot per foot of length to keep the numbers simple.
Now the length is 140ft.
So I would expect the total excavated volume to only be about 1400 cu.ft.
Then there's the volume of the pipe to deduct, so an answer about 1150 cu.ft is what I would be expecting.
But what do I know? I'm just a poor navvy.
Btw, there were only 20 cwt to a ton when I went to school
Perhaps you've allowed for inflation?
OMG! I thought it said 11 1/2 ft at the bottom not 1 1/2 foot
TO BE FAIR! You would need that much rubble for the ridiculously big hole I just made someone dig unnecessarily
(how many cwt to tons could be different I guess as there could be a miscommunication between metric and imperial - get into the 21st century guys!)
0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards