We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

how many kids ? home insurance

unbelieveable !! Having just got a quote from compare the market for Barclays home insurance...they provide their quote based on the assumption that there are no children living at the address. Fill in their form online and alter the number of children to 'four' and guess what ? your premium goes up !!
Now I wouldn't mind if...1) I was insuring my contents against accidental damage because im not. Or 2) I had specific, extremely valuable items in the home to insure, because I haven't. My quote is for the bog standard minimums as all Im really concerned about is fire, flood or theft....none of which my own children would do ! Has anyone else found this ?

Comments

  • InsideInsurance
    InsideInsurance Posts: 22,460 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Some home insurance policies include AD cover for entertainment equipment and sanitaryware as standard even if AD isnt included

    Insurance however isnt that logic driven but statistics driven. If they've analysed their portfolio and found that all things be equal that families with kids cost them more then they will charge more even if they cannot rationalise why (and often they dont bother trying to rationalise)

    If you wanted to try and guess the rationalisation then it could be that with 4 kids you get more distracted than if your a childless couple and so more likely to leave that pan on the stove that then catches fire
  • Unfortunately, from an insurer's point of view, it's a matter of risk. The risk of damage from 1 child compared to 4 child is a big difference. And unfortunately again, it's not like you can go to an insurance company and ask them to stay with you for a month and actually prove your kids do not damage your property...it's all computerised.
  • mikey72
    mikey72 Posts: 14,680 Forumite
    To be fair, my kids tv are better than mine, their phones are, they own ipods, they wear designer cloths, they ride bikes, they play musical instruments, so if we are burgled their stuff will be going first.
    And now they cook, they're going to burn the house down first as well.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.