We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
can lenders cache credit searches?
rogerblack
Posts: 9,446 Forumite
For example, I applied a couple of years ago, for some entry level cards, and at that time was turned down due to an unresolved debt.
This has subsequently become statute barred, and fallen off my credit report.
Are the lenders that looked at my credit report permitted to hold that credit report, and refer to it?
(To answer the question before someone raises it, I had intended to pay the money back at the time it was borrowed. Due to illness, this did not happen)
This has subsequently become statute barred, and fallen off my credit report.
Are the lenders that looked at my credit report permitted to hold that credit report, and refer to it?
(To answer the question before someone raises it, I had intended to pay the money back at the time it was borrowed. Due to illness, this did not happen)
0
Comments
-
No they dont because circumstances constantly change.
However if you had for example a credit facility with Barclaycard and defaulted on it, I would refrain from applying to them again just in case they themselves keep their own information.
Barclaycard used for example only, I'm not saying they do or dont keep their own information.0 -
I would imagine doing so would be a breach of the 5th principle of the DPA?...rogerblack wrote: »Are the lenders that looked at my credit report permitted to hold that credit report, and refer to it?
...ie, the "purpose" of the search 2 years ago was for an application then...not now.Personal data processed for any purpose or purposes shall not be kept for longer than is necessary for that purpose or those purposes.
http://www.ico.gov.uk/for_organisations/data_protection/the_guide/the_principles.aspx0 -
I agree with Yorkshireboy but how would you prove it?0
-
amex do thats for sureDon't put your trust into an Experian score - it is not a number any bank will ever use & it is generally a waste of money to purchase it. They are also selling you insurance you dont need.0
-
amex do thats for sure
Are you sure you're not referring to them using internal data? As in you defaulted with Amex themselves in the past and it has since fallen off your credit report. I know financial companies themselves can hold that information indefinitely (or they seem to).0 -
I think it's a popular misconception that lenders get a credit report in the same way as we do ourselves. They don't, they use an app which is provided by the CRAs. While they may print it especially if a decision goes to underwriters they would be silly to base new credit decisions on old reports.0
-
They may be unlikely to keep the "credit report", which as others have said is likely to be via online access and not in the form you see it, HOWEVER, it would be perfectly acceptable for them to record the reason they rejected your previous application.
So when you apply to Barclaycard (for example only) they might check for previous applications to them and find the one you made 3 years ago has "rejected - reason CCJ's on CRA" recorded as the reason for rejection. Whether and how they act on that information is anyone's guess, except theirs.Optimists see a glass half full
Pessimists see a glass half empty
Engineers just see a glass twice the size it needed to be
0 -
I guess in principle, a SAR for all data the lender holds on you would reveal if this is the case.0
-
rogerblack wrote: »I guess in principle, a SAR for all data the lender holds on you would reveal if this is the case.
However, do they REALLY send you all the information that they hold on you, like they should?
How would you know if they missed some out?!0 -
sharpy2010 wrote: »However, do they REALLY send you all the information that they hold on you, like they should?
How would you know if they missed some out?!
I wouldn't imagine them deliberately withholding anything. Large banks are generally pretty risk averse and wouldn't knowingly conceal information. And even if they did, there would be some employee with a grudge who would shop them to the ICO.Optimists see a glass half full
Pessimists see a glass half empty
Engineers just see a glass twice the size it needed to be
0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards