We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Life Insurance Query - Any Advice Please

Hi, we are after some advice on Life insurance etc.

Me, aged 31 & my wife 33 currently have a decreasing life insurance policy to cover our mortgage, which has 17 years left on it. We currently pay £29.12 for the JOINT policy.
We currently have no children, but hope to in the near future.:D

I have heard that a decreasing policy is kind of uselees and a level term policy would be a much better option, eg. it paying out up until either of us were 70 years old, instead of when the mortgage is finished.

I know we would be paying for longer, but is it better.

Also having seperate policys instead of a joint one, as, if one of us dies the joint policy will pay out, leaving the living remaining person having to find a policy (which would be more expensive, as they would be older).

Any advice on what we should do gratfully received

Comments

  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 121,283 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    I have heard that a decreasing policy is kind of uselees

    Where from? Because it certainly isnt.
    a level term policy would be a much better option, eg. it paying out up until either of us were 70 years old, instead of when the mortgage is finished.

    And costing your far more money in the process and appearing to cover a unrelated need.
    Also having seperate policys instead of a joint one, as, if one of us dies the joint policy will pay out, leaving the living remaining person having to find a policy (which would be more expensive, as they would be older).

    It is usually not cost effective where there is a joint need that only needs one payout to have two policies. The difference may not be double the cost but there will be a difference. So, why pay more than you need to?

    You almost certainly have different individual needs for income replacement and lost pension entitlement which could easily see individual plans or segments used there though.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.