We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Notice of penalty assessment

2

Comments

  • You need to separate the two issues.

    a) you were required to submit a return

    b) the result of submitting a return may be a tax liability, no tax liability, or a refund.

    there is no connection at all between these two things as far as penalties for non-submission go, you are clutching at straws there, sorry. By your logic, if you owed them money then they are ok to charge a late submission penalty, but if they owe you money, they shouldn't be allowed to. You were late submitting it, end of.

    On the delay on their returning the incorrectly filled form to you, that's just par for the course I'm afraid, the onus is on you to do it correctly. To be honest I think it came back to you quite quickly considering how it can be with the HMRC at the moment. I deal with one department that is often 2 months or more delayed in even opening the post they receive and logging the contents, by their own admission. I could ring today and be told 'we are opening post from 05 August today' (example) believe it or not.

    Just pay up and pronto, you won't win an argument with them over this, and the penalty will just keep going up.
    Cash not ash from January 2nd 2011: £2565.:j

    OU student: A103 , A215 , A316 all done. Currently A230 all leading to an English Literature degree.

    Any advice given is as an individual, not as a representative of my firm.
  • Pennywise
    Pennywise Posts: 13,468 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Regardless of what the HMRC webpage says, there is NO LEGAL OBLIGATION for a company director to submit a SA tax return.

    If HMRC instruct you to do one, then you, like anyone else, has to complete and submit one.

    There has been a lot of comment about this on other forums (such as accountingweb) and the conclusion is always that the underlying Act of Parliament DOESN'T place any legal obligation on a director to complete a SA return per se.

    So, forget the directors bit - it's a red herring.

    If you really didn't receive a tax return or a notice to complete, then you've got grounds for appeal and almost certainly will be successful.
  • missile
    missile Posts: 11,812 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Yes, I am well aware that it was my responsibility. Ignorance is no excuse etc.

    I can see the justice if I were trying to avoid paying tax but as I said it seems a ridiculous to insist on a self assessment for zero income. Very unfair to penalise me for late submission when HMRC have calculated that I have actually overpaid tax.

    Ofcourse I shall be paying the penalty charges. It is some consolation that after deducting all their charges from my tax refund, I am shall be in "profit"

    Thanks to all for taking the time to comment.
    "A nation's greatness is measured by how it treats its weakest members." ~ Mahatma Gandhi
    Ride hard or stay home :iloveyou:
  • missile
    missile Posts: 11,812 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Pennywise wrote: »
    Regardless of what the HMRC webpage says, there is NO LEGAL OBLIGATION for a company director to submit a SA tax return.

    If HMRC instruct you to do one, then you, like anyone else, has to complete and submit one.

    There has been a lot of comment about this on other forums (such as accountingweb) and the conclusion is always that the underlying Act of Parliament DOESN'T place any legal obligation on a director to complete a SA return per se.

    So, forget the directors bit - it's a red herring.

    If you really didn't receive a tax return or a notice to complete, then you've got grounds for appeal and almost certainly will be successful.

    Hi,

    I would be obliged if you could give me more information and / or point me to those other websites. :T
    "A nation's greatness is measured by how it treats its weakest members." ~ Mahatma Gandhi
    Ride hard or stay home :iloveyou:
  • Pennywise
    Pennywise Posts: 13,468 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    missile wrote: »
    Hi,

    I would be obliged if you could give me more information and / or point me to those other websites. :T

    A quick google search for "sa return for director" came up with the following which are good examples of the discussions. I.e. people refer to the HMRC webpage and are then knocked back by others quoting the actual legislation which says no such thing. Classic example of HMRC ignoring statue and making up their own rules as they go along.

    http://www2.accaglobal.com/uk/members/technical/advice_support/tax/income_tax/IT2012/directorssa

    http://www.accountingweb.co.uk/anyanswers/do-directors-have-automatically-file-tax-return

    http://www.accountingweb.co.uk/anyanswers/do-directors-have-file-tax-returns

    http://forums.aat.org.uk/archive/index.php/t-32307.html

    http://www.ukbusinessforums.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=185981
  • System
    System Posts: 178,377 Community Admin
    10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Pennywise wrote: »
    Regardless of what the HMRC webpage says, there is NO LEGAL OBLIGATION for a company director to submit a SA tax return.

    If HMRC instruct you to do one, then you, like anyone else, has to complete and submit one.

    There has been a lot of comment about this on other forums (such as accountingweb) and the conclusion is always that the underlying Act of Parliament DOESN'T place any legal obligation on a director to complete a SA return per se.

    So, forget the directors bit - it's a red herring.

    If you really didn't receive a tax return or a notice to complete, then you've got grounds for appeal and almost certainly will be successful.

    It could go 50/50, but its probably worth a try. As the June SA statement showed a penalty, a notice to file / return had been previously issued to OP (prob around Jan/Feb 2012 based on penalty dates). The question would normally be was it correctly served - ie sent to the correct address - rather than if it was received.
    They might be a little more lenient as OP had not previously completed returns and might not have been expecting one this time.

    It wouldn't explaining what happened to all of the other correspondence though.
    This is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com
  • Pennywise
    Pennywise Posts: 13,468 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    OP said they didn't start the company until November 2011, so wasn't a director in the 10/11 tax year, so shouldn't have been expected to do a 10/11 tax return anyway if it is based solely on being a company director. The 11/12 SA return isn't due yet, so there can't be any penalties for the 11/12 SA.

    I think more than likely, the SA record has been set up wrongly. It should have been set up for the 11/12 SA return to be the first, but sounds like it's been set up to expect a 10/11 one. Then probably the system has gone into over-drive with penalties etc - I've certainly seen this scenario before.

    As I say, almost certainly the penalties will be waived upon appeal.
  • System
    System Posts: 178,377 Community Admin
    10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Pennywise wrote: »
    OP said they didn't start the company until November 2011, so wasn't a director in the 10/11 tax year, so shouldn't have been expected to do a 10/11 tax return anyway if it is based solely on being a company director. The 11/12 SA return isn't due yet, so there can't be any penalties for the 11/12 SA.

    I missed that :)

    It wouldn't alter the strict legal position - return issued, so needed to be completed. But more often than not I've found HMRC take a pragmatic view in this type of scenario.
    This is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com
  • missile
    missile Posts: 11,812 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Pennywise wrote: »
    OP said they didn't start the company until November 2011, QUOTE] Sorry a typo:o, I started company November 2010.
    "A nation's greatness is measured by how it treats its weakest members." ~ Mahatma Gandhi
    Ride hard or stay home :iloveyou:
  • System
    System Posts: 178,377 Community Admin
    10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    missile wrote: »
    Pennywise wrote: »
    OP said they didn't start the company until November 2011, QUOTE] Sorry a typo:o, I started company November 2010.

    Ah, in which case perhaps consider post #8. Speak to HMRC about the missing correspondence - as they would have issued a fair bit before the SA statement.
    This is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.