We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Saving water - traditional taps

2»

Comments

  • gibson123 wrote: »
    it sound like you have young kids that leave the taps on.

    if it is a real problem and you are in danger of flooding you could consider fitting automatic shut off taps

    not such a daft question, as some s****asses here seem to think

    i considered something like this for an elderly relative who has arthritis and can take ages to turn off a water tap. We got an adjustment thingy from betterware than means she can manage better and it was a cheaper solution, but we would consider this again.

    Here an example

    http://www.taps4less.com/PP/U-TWS009.html

    had the OP asked the question & added it was because the kids left the taps on then they may have got a diff response, although you wouldn't have done.
    I'm only here while I wait for Corrie to start.

    You get no BS from me & if I think you are wrong I WILL tell you.
  • It would have been helpful, I should have said

    Several young children, leaving taps on but getting better, large taps and house suffers from high pressure. 30psi reducer already fitted.

    3 showers, 4 toilets and no water saving devices on anything inc. toilets.

    Obviously on meter :)
  • Hi.

    Try these?

    Especially if you don't already have means of isolation.

    GSR.
    Ask to see CIPHE (Chartered Institute of Plumbing & Heating Engineering)
  • keystone
    keystone Posts: 10,916 Forumite
    Nice idea. From a cost POV don't see the point. TBH.

    Cheers
    The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has it's limits. - Einstein
  • As you have four loo's

    Try placing a brick in the toilet cistern, saves up to 3 liters of water with every flush.
  • As you have four loo's

    Try placing a brick in the toilet cistern, saves up to 3 liters of water with every flush.

    & then they prob wouldn't flush the stuff away properly, which is why they brought out diff pans that use less water & the half flush for no 1's & full flush for no 2's
    I'm only here while I wait for Corrie to start.

    You get no BS from me & if I think you are wrong I WILL tell you.
  • Hintza
    Hintza Posts: 19,420 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    We recently had the water main replaced and it caused a number of problems in the village (blowing off fittings) but I just turned down the main valve before the water entered the property.
  • Hintza wrote: »
    We recently had the water main replaced and it caused a number of problems in the village (blowing off fittings) but I just turned down the main valve before the water entered the property.

    if the fittings were blowing off then they weren't fitted correctly or were faulty, by turning down the valve all you have done is reduced the flow the pressure is still the same & pressure is the prob you describe with the fittings.
    I'm only here while I wait for Corrie to start.

    You get no BS from me & if I think you are wrong I WILL tell you.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.