We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Direct Debit Question please?

Hello.
Can anyone please offer clarification on the following?

Question has recently come up as to why, as two private individuals with bank accounts, can set up a Standing Order between themselves, they do not appear to be able to set up a Direct Debit?

Given the fondness of Utility Companies, commercial concerns and indeed the banks themselves, for the use of D/Ds, one would have thought they ( the banks ) would have been only to happy to oblige.

Any thoughts please?
Thank you. Pete.

Comments

  • pqrdef
    pqrdef Posts: 4,552 Forumite
    Because some people are dishonest, and a system where payments are instigated by the payee is just the sort of thing they might be tempted to use dishonestly.
    "It will take, five, 10, 15 years to get back to where we need to be. But it's no longer the individual banks that are in the wrong, it's the banking industry as a whole." - Steven Cooper, head of personal and business banking at Barclays, talking to Martin Lewis
  • antrobus
    antrobus Posts: 17,386 Forumite
    Peteltt33 wrote: »
    Hello.
    Can anyone please offer clarification on the following?

    Question has recently come up as to why, as two private individuals with bank accounts, can set up a Standing Order between themselves, they do not appear to be able to set up a Direct Debit?

    Given the fondness of Utility Companies, commercial concerns and indeed the banks themselves, for the use of D/Ds, one would have thought they ( the banks ) would have been only to happy to oblige.

    Any thoughts please?
    Thank you. Pete.

    If you want to collect money by DD you have to be sponsored by a bank who will check whether you meet the "required criteria, which involve checks for integrity, financial standing and administrative capability".

    http://www.bacs.co.uk/Bacs/Businesses/DirectDebit/Collecting/Pages/GettingStarted.aspx

    If you think you meet the 'required criteria' you could give it a go. But it might be a bit expensive for just the odd payment here and there.
  • pmduk
    pmduk Posts: 10,710 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    There's nothing wrong with a standing order surely? If you need variable amounts to be sent then use faster payments.
  • dzug1
    dzug1 Posts: 13,535 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    pmduk wrote: »
    There's nothing wrong with a standing order surely? If you need variable amounts to be sent then use faster payments.

    Or just edit the standing order date and/or time whenever needed
  • Peteltt33 wrote: »
    Question has recently come up as to why, as two private individuals with bank accounts, can set up a Standing Order between themselves, they do not appear to be able to set up a Direct Debit?

    The reason is because who controls the transfer:

    Standing order - Push - the originating account holder must set it up, controls the amount, frequency and duration and can cancel it whenever

    Direct Debit - Pull - the recipient account holder simply certifies that the originating account holder has agreed to it being set up, the recipient controls the amount and frequency. The originating account holder can cancel it whenever


    So if you had the ability to set up DDs you could simply claim that any bank account holder had given you permission and withdraw as much as you want from their account.

    Under the DD guarantee the originating account holder could immediately get the money refunded as unauthorised but then your bank has the fight of getting the money off you, evidently a problem if you withdrew the £100,000 before any of your victims identified the fraud.


    In actual fact, "anyone" can apply for permission to set up DDs but there are vetting processes and guarantees that a private individual would struggle to meet.

    There are third party companies that will do DD on your behalf if you think they'd be useful (in a similar sort of way as PayPal) but their fees tend to be fairly high.
  • Peteltt33
    Peteltt33 Posts: 4 Newbie
    edited 23 September 2012 at 8:24PM
    Many thanks to Antrobus and Inside Insurance for your replies and for the link provided by Antrobus.

    So, in order to set up a Direct Debit between myself and another private party, I would have to go " cap-in-hand " to a Bank, so that " THEY " could then opine as to " MY " Integrity- Financial Standing and Administrative Capability.

    Given the performance of the Banks over the last five to ten years, I think that is a BIT B****Y RICH!

    Many thanks again, Pete.
  • I would argue they don't do it in the capacity of a higher moral standing but a much more practical aspect of "if we give them the authority are they going to run off with all our money by defrauding others and leaving us to carry the can?"
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.