We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Section 106 Agreement.....

Just a question wanting to know what others views are.

My shared ownership home that I brought when I was 18, has been in the process of selling for the last 3 months.

I am doing a simultaneous purchase, stair casing to 100%, and transferring it over to the person buying the property on the same day. This has been agreed that I can do it as the housing association has not been able to find anyone to buy my share.

However the father is buying the property for his daughter via his company, they are based in cyprus and the girl is at university here for 5 years.

The section 106 reads as follows:

The agreement placed an obligation on the original developer to provide an element of Affordable Apartments (eight in total) and to transfer ownership of these to an approved Housing Provider (i.e. the Housing Association in this case). As part of this there is a further obligation in the section 106 Agreement that all 'Initial' transfers to purchasers of the affordable apartments must be approved by the Council, which such approval not to be unreasonably withheld.


Now my solicitors and the buyers solicitors do not see any reason why the company could not buy it, because this states the initial transfer, which we assume was me when I first brought the property as a new build property.

The housing associations solicitors are not so sure and think's, the section 106 prevents sales except to people who meet the criteria set out by the local authority in that they must be local residents.


We have come to a complete stand still and are now waiting for the local authorities opinion.

I just wanted to know what your views were?

Comments

  • Fire_Fox
    Fire_Fox Posts: 26,026 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Shared ownership is supposed to be affordable housing for local people. I don't see that is matters what we think, you are at the mercy of the council since they still own a proportion of the house. If you had done the staircasing head of time the situation would be clear cut.
    Declutterbug-in-progress.⭐️⭐️⭐️ ⭐️⭐️
  • It's not the council that own it.
  • I would try to look at the real wording of the s106 agreement.
    The section 106 reads as follows:

    The agreement placed an obligation on the original developer to provide an element of Affordable Apartments (eight in total) and to transfer ownership of these to an approved Housing Provider (i.e. the Housing Association in this case). As part of this there is a further obligation in the section 106 Agreement that all 'Initial' transfers to purchasers of the affordable apartments must be approved by the Council, which such approval not to be unreasonably withheld.

    That isn't the agreement, but a summary prepared by someone of what it says (or what they think it says), so it will be very important to look at the actual wording rather than a mere summary.
    RICHARD WEBSTER

    As a retired conveyancing solicitor I believe the information given in the post to be useful assuming any properties concerned are in England/Wales but I accept no liability for it.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.8K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.