We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

85k protection.

2»

Comments

  • By too big to fail I'm looking at banks like State Bank of India - they have 14,000 branches worldwide, are the biggest bank in India and 60% state owned. No way that's going bust in my books and it pays out 4.5% on a 5 year fixed rate which is very good.
  • innovate
    innovate Posts: 16,217 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    it means so big that the government would definitely bail them out if necessary ... this is a view about how the government will act, rather than a guarantee, but the term "TBTF" is used in governments and central banks, and i think it reflects their thinking.

    I know what the term means. I don't know of any bank that has been tagged as TBTF, and nobody would ever guarantee such a status.

    Lehman Brothers was not considered TBTF, despite sparking off a global financial crisis.
  • yes, they don't like to say who is TBTF ... i've no idea how many are, but it's easy enough to pick the more obvious 1s and stick to them.
  • MarcoM
    MarcoM Posts: 809 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    I agree with some of the posters here.
    If hsbc were to fail I would think that the economic woes would be so bad that no one would get bailed out even for the 85k threshold. I may be wrong but i think that the likes of HSBC are probably safer than a santander...
    We would probably be trading in beans and potatos anyway if that happened...

    I just think that having ten or more 85k accounts would be a right pain.
  • MarcoM wrote: »
    I agree with some of the posters here.
    If hsbc were to fail I would think that the economic woes would be so bad that no one would get bailed out even for the 85k threshold. I may be wrong but i think that the likes of HSBC are probably safer than a santander...
    We would probably be trading in beans and potatos anyway if that happened...

    I just think that having ten or more 85k accounts would be a right pain.

    And this "comfort" about the strength of HSBC means they can get away with offering very low uncompetitive rates.....

    As you rightly say, if HSBC go bust it's global meltdown so on that basis the only reason you would invest with them is because you have used up all other options to the £85k max.

    PS - I will be opening joint accounts with my wife - it is £170k protection on that basis.

    Mr D
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.