We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Denied opening bank account
Banking_idiot
Posts: 3 Newbie
Hi,
I have recently tried to open a 123 bank account with santander. However, they told me that after putting in all my details (by phone) that I was denied the right to open a new account.
Does anyone know why this would have been the case?
I am currently with NatWest, haven't got any loans and pay my credit card off on direct debit (and have done so for the past 3 years or so).
Cheers!
I have recently tried to open a 123 bank account with santander. However, they told me that after putting in all my details (by phone) that I was denied the right to open a new account.
Does anyone know why this would have been the case?
I am currently with NatWest, haven't got any loans and pay my credit card off on direct debit (and have done so for the past 3 years or so).
Cheers!
0
Comments
-
Credit score.0
-
Get a copy of your credit report from Experian and see what it says
Credit score, CCJ, CIFAS loadings are the most likely culprits assuming you dont have a bankruptcy, IVA, defaults etc that you do know about but arent mentioning.0 -
Check your credit report
0 -
Ordering a copy of your report is sensible. You should also ask Santander to provide a more specific reason for saying no. Industry rules mean they should do this, although you sometimes need to ask. Might not be a credit scoring issue at all of course - it's also possible you've been turned away because of ID checks. They should be able to give you guidance on this.
James Jones“Official Company Representative
I am an official company representative of Experian. MSE has given permission for me to post in response to queries about the company, so that I can help solve issues. You can see my name on the companies with permission to post list. I am not allowed to tout for business at all. If you believe I am please report it to forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com This does NOT imply any form of approval of my company or its products by MSE"
Posts by James Jones, Neil Stone, Stuart Storey & Joe Standen0 -
dont waste your money though on paying for experian credit score as the figures mean nothing and are just a marketing swizz
Just get your report through the post for 2.00/2.50?For everthing else there's mastercard.
For clampers there's Barclaycard.0 -
Should or must?Experian_company_representative wrote: ». Industry rules mean they should do this
What level of detail must they give you?
Which rules explicitly are you talking about?
Have to say with one exception the only response I've ever really had when pushing credit issuers is that it is a "commercial decision"0 -
InsideInsurance wrote: »Should or must?
What level of detail must they give you?
Which rules explicitly are you talking about?
Have to say with one exception the only response I've ever really had when pushing credit issuers is that it is a "commercial decision"
The problem is that if your information has been put through a credit scoring engine and it has spat out a no, it will be because of a combination of factors and often it is impossible to pick out an actual reason, especially since these credit scoring systems are effectively black boxes which you put information in one end of and get a response out the other.
All the bank can say is "we have criteria, you didn't meet some of these criteria." And they don't have to disclose the criteria, because it is sensitive information (good old application fraudsters...)urs sinserly,
~~joosy jeezus~~0 -
JuicyJesus wrote: »All the bank can say is "we have criteria, you didn't meet some of these criteria." And they don't have to disclose the criteria, because it is sensitive information (good old application fraudsters...)
I would correct "can" to "do" but otherwise the above was my understanding but our friend at Experian seems to think otherwise hence the question.
As to it being a big black box, whilst I cannot disprove this as true or not I would be surprised if it is true.
Certainly looking at something similar in insurance rating engines then it is a big black box to the sales guys and they have no access to the calculations.
The normal underwriters however can see some of the intermediary steps/ outputs from the big black box which enables them to make decisions to over rule the black box.
The underwriting managers, pricing managers, commercial directors (in theory) and MD (in theory) etc however have full access and can see exactly the calculations done in each step/ output. It is very rarely used for the purposes of making individual decisions but is used for statistical analysis on rating accuracy, pricing sensitivity, performance etc plus also checking spurious results arent coming out if unexpected sales spikes/ troughs are being witnessed within certain demographics
Obviously credit underwriting is different to insurance underwriting but I'd be highly surprised if a bank has a big black box with nothing coming out of it but a yay or nay0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards