We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
A quickie...........

londondealer
Posts: 203 Forumite

Just need to ask a wee favour and pick a brain or two!
My nephew Was up until last week renting a chalet type bungalow from someone who built it in the grounds of his property.
My nephew did not have contents insurance.
To cut a long story short there was a fire in the property which has destroyed all of my nephews property.
The owner of the building had let his buildings insurance lapse. The tenancy agreement states that the landlord would have buildings insurance.
My question is does my nephew have any legal rights with regards to the losses he sustained?
My nephew Was up until last week renting a chalet type bungalow from someone who built it in the grounds of his property.
My nephew did not have contents insurance.
To cut a long story short there was a fire in the property which has destroyed all of my nephews property.
The owner of the building had let his buildings insurance lapse. The tenancy agreement states that the landlord would have buildings insurance.
My question is does my nephew have any legal rights with regards to the losses he sustained?
0
Comments
-
What caused the fire ?0
-
Oh sorry it was due to dodgy electrics.0
-
If the landlord has been negligent, then he will be liable. (Irrespective of whether or not he is insured).
But if negligence cannot be proved, then he has no liability.0 -
Thank you Quentin. Do you mean negligence with regards to the electrical work or the lapse in buildings insurance?0
-
Ok I'm guessing you mean the electrical work?0
-
The buildings insurance is irrelevant, (though it may mean the landlord has no insurance cover at all to deal with any third party liabilities he has, and must personally pay out if found negligent).
It may be hard to prove the electrical work has been carried out negligently by the landlord.
But if there is any negligence that can be proved (by any party eg. the electrician), then the nephew can claim against them or their insurer.0 -
londondealer wrote: »Thank you Quentin. Do you mean negligence with regards to the electrical work or the lapse in buildings insurance?
It will be the electrical work. The buildings insurance would not have covered your nephews items anyway. He would have needed to have contents insurance.
However, as the poster mentions, the nephew may be able to claim against the landlord if you can prove he was negligent. But, be careful as this could be expensive if more than a small claims amount and there is no guarantee of winning.0 -
Thank you Quentin really appreciate your time.0
-
And you too Maginot.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards