We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Lodger or Tenant?
Comments
-
There are argumants to say this set up makes you a lodger, and other arguments to say you would have more rights/protection.
Whether in fact this type of set-up is an AST, Excuded Occupier or Ocupier with basic protection can ultimately only be determined by a court.
If you make an issue of this now, you will never find out as you will not get to live there.
If the LL is "a nice guy", resolves any repair issues /complaints promptly, and generally looks after you, you will never find out as you will not need to go to court.
Only if the place starts to fall apart or the heating breaks down, and the LL does nothing, or the LL suddenly tries to evict you within 24 hours, will there be an issue.
You could then threaten (and follow up) 'illegal eviction', 'harassment', 'failure to register the deposit' etc. If it then went to court, THEN you'd find out what rights/protection you had! If any.
Personally I would not worry. Take basic precautions eg
* get receipts for all deposit, rent etc
* have clear (ideally written) agreement about whether you can have overnight guests, visitors (for how long...?), frequency/reasons why LL might want access, delivery of your post (shared letter box?), elecoral registration etc etc.
If both sides are clear about ground rules and happy with them then don't rock the boat.
But clearly if you want the freedom to invite long-term visitors, want absolute privacy, or other things AST tenants take for granted but this LL may not agree to, then walk away. Not worth arguing over (guaranteed to sour the relationship). Just find an AST elsewhere.
Inventory? More a problem for him than you. If the cooker is missing when you leave, how will he prove it was ever there.....?
TV licence is strange. If you ARE a lodger and it's a single residence I don't believe you need your own licence, but I may be wrong.0 -
Just googled TV licence - if you live in an annex you need your own licence - sorry, can't post the link.0
-
Just out of interest - what is the monthly rent/lodger charge? Thanks."If you can bear to hear the truth you've spoken
Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools"
Extract from "If" by Rudyard Kipling0 -
Its 475 (400 + 75 for utilities)0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards