We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Martin Lewis stands up for renters on breakfast TV
Comments
-
-
ruggedtoast wrote: »You scoffed at Martin.
:money::mad:
It was a gentle mocking rather than a full throated scoff.
The difference is subtle, that I grant you. :O)0 -
-
I still can't see how you can lose as a landloard, a free house is a free house even if its final value varies.
I do still think the the word parasite does best described the relationship of most landlords and the housing market. The basic question are landlords in it for the good of the housing market or the good of themselves?
Honeymoon was loverly cheers.
I really can’t understand your resentment of landlord the returns are not that high any business is there to make money and charge what the market will bear.
In the seventies there was very little private property to rent and a lot of what was available was substandard.
Glad you enjoyed honymoon
0 -
That simply means you have no idea what's involved. If "you couldn't lose" everyone would be doing it. Or investing in companies that do.
However the reality is that landlords can & do go bust.
One of my friends went through two in the same flat. The second time the court forgot to send him the eviction notice.
Then he moved to another flat and a few months later that landlord was being repossessed too.
It was east London.0 -
-
-
Well, I'm not sure who to feel sorrier for, the residents of Damascus or those poor beleaguered renters...
I'm a landlord and have never treated any tenant other than how I would expect to have been treated myself when I rented. I imagine I'm not the only one who operates that way
Get some perspective for goodness sake.
i've rented loads of places. i think the worst thing that happened was that the LL of a place i lived in charged me £10 for ruining a grill pan which he said was in mint condition when i moved in. it wasn't, but the inventory didn't mention its condition so i don't think it was a dishonest attempt to stiff us, personally.0 -
JonnyBravo wrote: »That's just a part of the story though isn't it Percy.
You like to portray the innocent bystander but I'm not sure it all adds up.
For example you like to bandy around such provocative stuff as calling all us landlords "parasites". It's hardly surprising one of the nutters on here therefore wanted to return the favour and taunt you back.
It is now clear we homeowners are the losers in some financial scenarios thanks to ruggedtoasts highlighting of the issue. It therefore stands to reason as a landlord we stand a chance of being a loser twice over or worse!
Please bear that in mind in the future.
It's not all champagne and truffles you know.
p.s. Hope you had a nice honeymoon
Couldnt agree more. It certainly isnt all a bed of roses being a landlord! We win some and lose some when it comes to bad tenants and those that are good, we try and hold on to and treat them with the respect they deserve. On the other hand, we have had, and currently still do have, tenants who have set out to mislead us which has cost us both financially and emotionally. We have worked hard all our lives, saved where we could and gone without to try and make a small business but the road has been full of potholes along the way.
At the moment, we would willingly get rid of our few properties (which we have mortgages on incidentally) even if if meant having a more meagre lifestyle than we already do at present. However, we cant sell in the current climate so have to hang on in there!0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards