We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Keeping second house 'on'.
vonvonvon
Posts: 38 Forumite
My partner who lives with me owns a house, on which he has about 10 years left to pay on his mortgage. His elderly mum has just moved into his house for the foreseeable future as she has just sold her house, realising her assets and is now ‘enjoying’ what she has struggled to achieve financially over the years. I suppose in a way, she could be classed as ‘house-sitting’ for him; or am I being naïve?
In this day and age, it is in both our interests to keep his house on just in case we encounter problems in our relationship. (Burnt bridges and all that).
Can anyone offer any advice or words of wisdom please?
Many thanks.
In this day and age, it is in both our interests to keep his house on just in case we encounter problems in our relationship. (Burnt bridges and all that).
Can anyone offer any advice or words of wisdom please?
Many thanks.
Vonvonvon:happylove
0
Comments
-
Let him keep paying the Council Tax and keep using this as his main residence.0
-
We have been paying joint C/Tax at my address for about five years. His mum is now registered as the sole occupier at his house. We would really like to 'keep the house on' if at all possible
a) so that his mum can live in it until such a time she needs a bungalow (she is 75 and has some minor mobility problems relating to hip replacements in the past)
b) my son (11) at some point will want a place of his own and as things are going, may never be able to afford to buy a property himself so 'keeping it on' may provide an option for his independence when the time comes.
I would also like to add that we both work full time and not claiming any benefits to fund either property.
Any advice gratefully received.Vonvonvon:happylove0 -
I don't see any problems in dong this except if you ever do want to sell it, it will probably be liable for Capital gains Tax as it is not your main home.
If you put it into joint names, you will get double the CGT exemption.
We have also 'kept our house on' when we moved to Spain, for similar reasons to yourselves (son needs somewhere to live etc).(AKA HRH_MUngo)
Member #10 of £2 savers club
Imagine someone holding forth on biology whose only knowledge of the subject is the Book of British Birds, and you have a rough idea of what it feels like to read Richard Dawkins on theology: Terry Eagleton0 -
Assuming his mum is not paying rent etc to your partner, why should'nt she pay the council tax on the house she is living in? As a single OAP, would'nt she get a reduction on Council Tax anyway?
If she pays the council tax and nothing else except bills and shopping - she is very fortunate.
SwampyExpect the worst, hope for the best, and take what comes!!:o0 -
a) so that his mum can live in it until such a time she needs a bungalow (she is 75 and has some minor mobility problems relating to hip replacements in the past)
QUOTE]
By 'needs a bungalow', would you be assuming that she would then apply to the council, or that she will be keeping enough money back to buy one?
If the former, then as she already has a home it would probably be highly unlikely that the council would help. If the latter, then would there be a problem should she be priced out of the market?
Should something unplanned happen, such as your partner were to be made redundant, what are the plans regarding his house, paying the mortgage, and his Mums housing needs then? Has he talked ALL possibilities such as these over with his mum?
Also agree with previous poster that Mum should pay her own council tax - she would get a discount as a sole occupier.0 -
I assumed that the property was not going to be sold, as the OP wants to keep it for her son, therefore his mum would not be able to 'keep enough money back to buy one' (it's not her house anyway).
If she has mobility problems then the council/housing association be able to help her.(AKA HRH_MUngo)
Member #10 of £2 savers club
Imagine someone holding forth on biology whose only knowledge of the subject is the Book of British Birds, and you have a rough idea of what it feels like to read Richard Dawkins on theology: Terry Eagleton0 -
Ah, maybe I read it wrong? The way I see it, Mum has sold her own house and is now living in sons house - who still has a 10 year mortgage that he is paying?seven-day-weekend wrote: »I assumed that the property was not going to be sold, as the OP wants to keep it for her son, therefore his mum would not be able to 'keep enough money back to buy one' (it's not her house anyway).
If she has mobility problems then the council/housing association be able to help her.
As regards Ha/Council house- you are really at the mercy of whatever area you live in. Some may help, others (mine!!) will not help you unless you are homeless - expecting your current property to be adapted instead.0 -
Ah yes, you are right about Mum already having sold her house.
In my area of the UK people with medical needs can get allocated a property - there are some designated for elderly/disabled people that are exempt from the RTB scheme and are therefore available to those for whom it is intended.
However, I still think keeping the house is a good thing for the OP to do - as I say, we have kept ours in case we need a bolthole and our son lives in it with two other young men.
It's really no-one else's business who pays the Councuil Tax in the OP's house as long as it is paid, surely?(AKA HRH_MUngo)
Member #10 of £2 savers club
Imagine someone holding forth on biology whose only knowledge of the subject is the Book of British Birds, and you have a rough idea of what it feels like to read Richard Dawkins on theology: Terry Eagleton0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
