We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
How do i safeguard my kids inheritance from stepchild
Comments
-
The OP says they had a huge row and she has now seen a different side to her husband. Maybe now is not a good time to be asking him to make a will ! Really should have been sorted out before now though.0
-
The OP says they had a huge row and she has now seen a different side to her husband. Maybe now is not a good time to be asking him to make a will ! Really should have been sorted out before now though.
No, but it sounds like a brilliant time for her to make one!
OP - you might want to enquire about the possibility of putting as much of your estate as possible in trust if your children are minors.Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants - Michael Pollan
48 down, 22 to go
Low carb, low oxalate Primal + dairy
From size 24 to 16 and now stuck...0 -
Thanks everyone for the replys, his son is 25, my children are 14 and 16. I will have to get legal advice for both of us, but as someone posted now isn't the right time. When we bought the house initially i couldn't put my name on the mortgage, but the legal adviser also said it wasn't a big deal because we had equal rights, i was a stay at home mum, but i also invested 50 of purchase price from the sale of my previous house. I have no intentions of excluding his son. I don't have a clue about joint tenants or tenants in common.
As i now understand in Scottish law the house would become my house, it is re-payment mortgage. His life insurance policies and any assets would be shared, equally? between me and his son? He would be a wealthy boy. The other way at least my kids would benefit in the same way.0 -
Yawn...
And your contribution to this thread is??
And yes you're right, I'm not listening to you, you haven't actually said anything of note yet.0 -
Thanks everyone for the replys, his son is 25, my children are 14 and 16. I will have to get legal advice for both of us, but as someone posted now isn't the right time. When we bought the house initially i couldn't put my name on the mortgage, but the legal adviser also said it wasn't a big deal because we had equal rights, i was a stay at home mum, but i also invested 50 of purchase price from the sale of my previous house. I have no intentions of excluding his son. I don't have a clue about joint tenants or tenants in common.
As i now understand in Scottish law the house would become my house, it is re-payment mortgage. His life insurance policies and any assets would be shared, equally? between me and his son? He would be a wealthy boy. The other way at least my kids would benefit in the same way.
There isn't 'joint tenants' etc under Scottish law but there's a similar system (which I put a link to an explanation of earlier). You might be able to check your exact situation via the Land Registry if you don't have easy access to the deeds and don't want to discuss this with him at present.
Your biggest potential problem with ensuring that your children inherit their fair share of your estate is (assuming they are not your husband's children) if you died intestate and the bulk of the estate passed to your husband. That would then become his estate and they would AFAIK have no claim on it when he then passed away. Hence my suggestion of investigating the possibility of setting up a trust (these aren't limited to minors).
I really would urge you to get proper legal advice rather than relying on what anyone says on here - including me!Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants - Michael Pollan
48 down, 22 to go
Low carb, low oxalate Primal + dairy
From size 24 to 16 and now stuck...0 -
Your biggest potential problem with ensuring that your children inherit their fair share of your estate is (assuming they are not your husband's children) if you died intestate and the bulk of the estate passed to your husband. That would then become his estate and they would AFAIK have no claim on it when he then passed away.
And his son could lose out if he died first so you can raise the issue with your husband as a joint problem - you both need to ensure some security for the next generation.0 -
His life insurance policies and any assets would be shared, equally? between me and his son? He would be a wealthy boy. The other way at least my kids would benefit in the same way.
You want life insurance kept out of the estate if possible, by putting it in trust.
Once prior and legal rights are satisfied, the residue is distributed according to a hierarchy. Children are top of that list, so they would take the entire residue to themelves. Spouses are fifth. With no will, you will get prior and legal rights only. The children will (in equal shares) get legal rights and everything else that is left.
Assuming that prior rights covers all heritable property, the moveables would end up being split on-third to you and two-thirds shared between the children. That two-thirds is one-third legal rights and one-third according to the hierarchy. You can control that last one-third by writing a will.
It is also important, although probably irrelevant at the moment, that if any of the children predecease then their share (under both legal rights and other rights arising through intestacy) is distributed to their issue per stirpes. e.g. if the stepson predeceases and leaves children, those children will inherit his share under legal rights and any other rights for an intestate.0 -
And his son could lose out if he died first so you can raise the issue with your husband as a joint problem - you both need to ensure some security for the next generation.
His son has legal rights to one-ninth of his dad's estate. If OP husband dies intestate, stepson would inherit two-ninths of the estate. That is potentially less than they would receive if OP died first but it is far from the nothing that would happen if OP husband died intestate under English law.
But anyway, MAKE A WILL.0 -
Surely life insurance is outwith an estate? It doesn't exist until the assured dies.
Unless taken out by someone else, or placed in trust, the benefit pays out to the deceased.
See https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/17779590
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.1K Spending & Discounts
- 244.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards