We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Driving other cars extension.
Comments
-
The Policyholder may also drive, with the owners permission, a motor car not owned by the Policyholder and not hired to the policyholder under a leasing or hire purchase agreement, as long as the motor car has valid cover in force under another insurance policy.
seems perfectly clear to me and is how it always was
but thanks for showing its still alive and well bob in the bedsit0 -
-
-
Bedsit_Bob wrote: »It hasn't been on my previous certificates.
What wasn't?0 -
Bedsit_Bob wrote: »It hasn't been on my previous certificates.
If it wasn't shown on your previous certificates, then you never had that cover (irrespective of anything written in your policy - it's your cert that is the only doc the police would accept to show you had DOC cover)0 -
Every certificate I've had since I stopped fronting in 2005 has said that.
But yes, the insurance industry, like the rest of the financial sector in this country, is one big evil greedy joke, and I advise (against consensus) to tell them whatever cannot be proven to make your premium cheaper.
Incidentally, why in Poland, with 5x the fatality rate and the same compensation culture as here, does it only cost about £150 a year to fully insure anything AND anyone can then drive it?0 -
Mr_Thrifty wrote: »all insurance is basically a rip off
do you know if anyone has ever gotten any money back from an insurance company?
My sister did OK when someone bumped into the back of her. New bumper even though it could have been repaired.
And they all got over £1000 each compensation.Censorship Reigns Supreme in Troll City...0 -
Gloomendoom wrote: »What wasn't?If it wasn't shown on your previous certificates, then you never had that cover
Not the DOC statement (that was on the certificates), but the bit about the car being already insured.0 -
-
Bedsit_Bob wrote: »Not the DOC statement (that was on the certificates), but the bit about the car being already insured.
It either was never a requirement for the other car to be insured with most companies who never specified this. Some had a wording in the policy although as it was not specified on the certificate the Insurer would arguably still have to pick up claims under the RTA and then try and recover their outlay from their own policyholder0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards