PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Property Restricted Covenants - Advice

Options
2»

Comments

  • propertyman
    propertyman Posts: 2,922 Forumite
    modd1uk wrote: »
    Not entirely sure what you mean by the transfer of part ? I know the house is freehold.

    EDIT --- It does say "Transfer Of Part - imposing restrictive covenants" at the start of the first page ?

    Andy

    Transfer of part is as posted, carving off parts of the original one price of land into many, one of which is the freehold of your home.

    As you have located when reading the document the restrictive covenants, those that you identified earlier as to new structures, have been duplicated in all the "parts" ie all the new homes on the estate.
    Stop! Think. Read the small print. Trust nothing and assume that it is your responsibility. That way it rarely goes wrong.
    Actively hunting down the person who invented the imaginary tenure, "share freehold";
    if you can show me one I will produce my daughter's unicorn
  • robatwork
    robatwork Posts: 7,268 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Blimey are Beazer Homes still going? I remember their league...
  • modd1uk
    modd1uk Posts: 25 Forumite
    robatwork wrote: »
    Blimey are Beazer Homes still going? I remember their league...

    No they were bought out by Persimmon a while ago.
  • societys_child
    societys_child Posts: 7,110 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 11 August 2012 at 10:27AM
    I think you're making a rod for your own back. Many, many properties have restrictive covenants which no one enforces.

    I certainly wouldn't have contacted Persimmon.

    Edit: The covenant won't affect PP, the planners won't be interested in covenants.
  • We have had the same thing come back from our solicitors, I have reread the clause over and over again and it states that permission would only need to be sought within 5 years of the transfer (which was Oct 97), do you think we wil also have an issue having not gained permission?
  • an issue having not gained permission, for what?

    and Oct '97 was erm . . . 15 years ago:)
  • vivatifosi
    vivatifosi Posts: 18,746 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Mortgage-free Glee! PPI Party Pooper
    I think you're making a rod for your own back. Many, many properties have restrictive covenants which no one enforces.

    I certainly wouldn't have contacted Persimmon.

    Edit: The covenant won't affect PP, the planners won't be interested in covenants.

    And many other properties have restrictive covenants that are enforced.

    Nobody can know the ins and outs of a particular estate unless they
    a) Read the covenants that pertain to that estate, and get someone who understands them to cast an eye over them.
    b) Understand how those covenants are applied locally by those who have a right to enforce them.

    Where I live the ultimate sanction is an injunction to stop your build, so its defintely worth finding out before making an expensive mistake, though I do think a few hundred quid for a shed (per the OP) is pretty punative.
    Please stay safe in the sun and learn the A-E of melanoma: A = asymmetry, B = irregular borders, C= different colours, D= diameter, larger than 6mm, E = evolving, is your mole changing? Most moles are not cancerous, any doubts, please check next time you visit your GP.
  • According to the op there are buildings/ conservatories etc all over the estate. Doesn't appear to have affected anyone, of course things could go wrong.
    I've ignored many old covenants, nothing has ever turned round and bitten me so was just giving my opinion.

    and yeah, a nice little earner for "allowing" a shed :cool:
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.