We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Currys Oven
dommoore
Posts: 2 Newbie
My elderly (84 years old) grandmother purchased an all in one oven and hob from Currys on 2nd August. AEG Model 49002VMN (along with a 5 year extended warranty, but thats a different and equally annoying story).
It has a very fiddly method of operation and in my opinion not suitable for the purchaser. The buttons are very hard to see, and very arkward for someone as advanced in years.
I have spent the best part of 2 hours trying to explain the operation to her, but she cannot grasp it.
I have contacted Currys and they are hiding behind their returns policy, it has been used and cannot be returned.
I have tried to look at the sale of goods act with regard to suitability of the end user, but am struggling to find anything. I believe Currys been negligent selling such a product to an elderly person.
Can someone help me and my daft old Gran??
It has a very fiddly method of operation and in my opinion not suitable for the purchaser. The buttons are very hard to see, and very arkward for someone as advanced in years.
I have spent the best part of 2 hours trying to explain the operation to her, but she cannot grasp it.
I have contacted Currys and they are hiding behind their returns policy, it has been used and cannot be returned.
I have tried to look at the sale of goods act with regard to suitability of the end user, but am struggling to find anything. I believe Currys been negligent selling such a product to an elderly person.
Can someone help me and my daft old Gran??
0
Comments
-
How exactly do you prove that Currys have been negligent in selling such a product?
Based on the way the above is written you were not present when your gran was in the shop - so how exactly you would prove this I really don't know.
You should be looking for missold in SOGA if that's how you feel, as this would, if you deem it so, be miss selling, not suitability.0 -
I have got a picture of the oven, but as a newbie I'm not allowed to post a link
I was not present, nor was anyone else.
I have searched the sale of goods act again and cannot find a mention on mis-selling0 -
2D, E and F is what you are looking for - specifically the process of fit for purpose:
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1979/54
The problem you have is proving that your Gran asked for a specific good, with specific conditions and that Curry's intentionally ignored that request and sold her a product in contradiction to the request.
Proving that will be quite a feat based on the information you've supplied so far. Unfortunately I cannot see how you will be able to realistically prove this - unless you can obtain a recording of the process of sale...0 -
Was the cooker not on display in the store?0
-
You think the sales person should have said "I think you're too old to use this oven, you'll need a simpler one..."?! And you and your grandmother would have been happy with a comment like that?
Did you grandmother not choose the oven herself? Or see it before purchasing? It is not for the salesperson to question the age/ability/intelligence of the user!0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards