We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Buildings Insurance

We have recently found out that we have been incorrectly paying buildings insurance for our property, which is shared equity/ownership, for the last five years.

Trying to sort this out with our current insurer is proving to be a nightmare.

I was informed this morning that our current insurer can only give us a 50% refund and that our buildings insurer through the housing association will have to pay the remainder due to a law which prevents our current insurer from paying the full amount. Does anyone know anything about this?

It seems a little harsh that we may have to ask our insurer through the H.A for half of the refund when the fault is nothing to do with them.

I am now awaiting a letter regarding the above from our current insurer so am hoping that this law is mentioned in there but thought i would ask on here. We may be going to Trading Standards about this to find out about the law as well.

Comments

  • InsideInsurance
    InsideInsurance Posts: 22,460 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    A little more detail about what mistake has happened etc would be helpful
  • bach230
    bach230 Posts: 68 Forumite
    What detail do you require? I started typing things but felt i was repeating myself!
  • rs65
    rs65 Posts: 5,682 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    If two insurers covered the same risk then they would probably share any claim that arose. It seems right that they would each refund 50% now that the issue has been discovered.

    Not sure if there if there is a relevant law, as such, but it is the way insurance contracts work.
  • This sound a bit like you having 'dual insurance'. Do a search on this.

    You have to be clear on what the insurance policies cover because arguably the HA may have insured for something different than your home insurers because they have slightly different interests.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.