We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Parking Eye - still ignorable?

Hello,
Having moved house recently I just got FINAL NOTICE (3rd letter) from Parking Eye, forwarded to my new address. Letters 1 & 2 didn't catch up with me.

Can you confirm that the position is still the same as previous helpful posts regarding Parking Eye? i.e. if I ignore them they will go away and are still not issueing any court proceedings?

Thanks for your advice...

Bingobrain

Comments

  • pogofish
    pogofish Posts: 10,853 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Absolutely nothing has changed - Keep ignoring! :)
  • Stephen_Leak
    Stephen_Leak Posts: 8,762 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 6 August 2012 at 9:40PM
    Since the landmark case in May, only the car park owners can take anyone to court. PPCs can still try to trick you into paying, though.

    Check the letters thread to see how many more there could be to go.
    The acquisition of wealth is no longer the driving force in my life. :)
  • Yes, my letter is as letter 3 scanned to the thread... so I guess I'll wait it out and expect one or two more.

    Thanks for confirming these scammers can still be ignored.

    I guess they may get their act together at some stage to appropriately "represent" the land owner, or threaten to bring actions on their behalf. The set letters they are sending at present appear unenforceable even under the May changes in case law that you discuss.

    Thanks for giving me the resolve to ignore!
  • bazster
    bazster Posts: 7,436 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    They may well seek to change the nature of their relationship with the landowners, but really they only have two choices:

    (i) They accept that they are merely the landowner's agent - but for this to work the landowner would also have to accept it, and I can't see any landowner who has an inkling of the kind of people he is dealing with falling for that one! Could get him into all manner of unwanted hassle and hot water.

    (ii) They get the landowner to grant them a licence to occupy. Even less chance of a landowner going for that one! Would anyone in their right mind want P|key Parking Ltd. squatting on their land as-of-right?
    Je suis Charlie.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.5K Life & Family
  • 261.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.