PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING

Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.

We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum. This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are - or become - political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Save or repay?

Hi all,

I bought my first house 3 years ago with a mortgage. I then moved to London with work and now rent the house out. My mortgage company charged me a one off admin fee so that I could let the property and I now rent a flat in London.

Before the move to London I had been making overpayments on my mortgage and, with current house prices, I estimate my mortgage to be approx. 40% of the value of the house.

As I struggle to come to terms with the amount of money I am paying a landlord in London (!!) I would like to purchase a flat in London in the near future.

Without selling my original house (as I think it has excellent potential) I think I've got 2 options:

1. Continue to save cash to act as a deposit on my flat purchase in London; or

2. Use my spare cash to reduce the mortgage on my first house.

Which do you think is the better option? I'd probably get my second mortgage with the same mortgage provider so not sure if they'd prefer me to go to them with a 40% mortgage on property one and cash towards property two or a smaller % mortgage on property one and no cash for property two.

Any thoughts welcomed whilst I try and sort an appointment to see a mortgage advisor.

Thanks,

Dex

Comments

  • G_M
    G_M Posts: 51,977 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    If you reduce the mortgage on your own property you will lose the tax benefit and end up paying more tax.

    You are paying tax on it yes?

    Saving also means you have a contingency fund in case you meet the tenant from hell.....

    More here.
  • dexter-boy
    dexter-boy Posts: 21 Forumite
    Ah yes, I hadn't thought about it from that angle. By reducing my mortgage I'd have a higher level of taxable rental income.

    I guess saving the cash and keeping the morgage as it is, is probably the best approach.
  • BitterAndTwisted
    BitterAndTwisted Posts: 22,492 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    That consent-to-let from your mortgage-lender isn't open-ended. You could find that once you start applying for a second residential mortgage you may be compelled to change to a Buy-To-Let mortage on the first. These usually require that you have 25% equity in the property and that the monthly rent is 125% of the mortgage-payments.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 347.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 251.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 452.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 240.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 616.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 175.3K Life & Family
  • 253.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.