We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Stamp Duty - New Budget

13»

Comments

  • mchu6am4 wrote: »
    What do you mean by a private cash transfer? Is this legal and how is it possible? The only reason I'm asking is I know a FTB buyer who is buying at £136k with £30k deposit - However they would love to buy it at £125k and pay the extra as 'private cash transfer' if I correctly understand what this means.
    I'd be very surprised if it's legal. It's basically a form of tax evasion, but it's bound to occur if the government insist on such a perverse "retrospective" tax rate. If the buyer and seller trust each other (or an intermediary) and arrange an off-the-record cash payment to cover smallish sums above the Stamp Duty threshold the buyer can avoid a disproportionate tax payment and the seller can get a better price.

    Better if Stamp Duty applied only to the amount above the threshold. For example a rate of around 3% on the amount above £125,000 might be revenue neutral overall but would mean a £135,000 purchase would be taxed at £300 rather than £1,350. At the other end of the band a £250,000 purchase would be taxed at £3,750 rather than £2,500. Then at £260,000 the tax would be £3,900, so no sudden jump of over £5,000 at that threshold either.
  • Smallish. I know someone who did this with £60K on a £280K house.

    Not legal but they haven't been caught - yet.

    :)

    GG
    There are 10 types of people in this world. Those who understand binary and those that don't.
  • Massive_2
    Massive_2 Posts: 63 Forumite
    you might expect a £250,000 sale to be accompanied by a private cash transfer!

    Property purchase can be accompanied by an additional payment for associated chattels and fixtures that are not part of the property, and which is exempt from SDLT liability.

    But HMRC stipulates that should the transaction be scrutinised, realistic values must be attributed (to both chattels, and to the property itself).

    Read into that what you will, but there are always ways and means.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.