We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Blue Badge Renewal

13»

Comments

  • BobQ
    BobQ Posts: 11,181 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    edited 30 July 2012 at 1:11AM
    There are in essence two groups those who are [DLAHRM & discretionary] and are not [independent mobility assessment ] automatically entitled, this independent mobility assessment carried out by an OT or Physio would then be considered by a panel. Now the LA not the DfT is responsible and accountable.
    /////

    - no one, not one person ever should ever be able to 'skip' the assessment.

    Those individuals in the non- discretionary group should all be made subject to the assessment, and those LA's that are clearly still allowing through the old self-assessment with a GP's letter should sanctioned and made to follow the DfT’s good practice which was distributed last year ........

    If you read the DTp guidelines, those not automatically entitled (discretionary) should be subject to an independent assessment. They do NOT state that they necessarily have to attend an assessment interview with a OT. It could be a paper based assessment. It is perfectly acceptable for a GP to provide factual medical information (but not opinion) to a trained and independent assessor who can make a decision based on the available facts. This may include approval or rejection as well as calling the applicant to attend an assessment interview in person. An authority doing this is in fact following the new process not the old one.
    Few people are capable of expressing with equanimity opinions which differ from the prejudices of their social environment. Most people are incapable of forming such opinions.
  • Just a quick update... Badge now expired 2 weeks. Promised call from OT not received, no communication at all from Council. Life has become much more difficult.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.