We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Books on understanding and getting started?

2»

Comments

  • grey_gym_sock
    grey_gym_sock Posts: 4,508 Forumite
    you're not selling this book very effectively to me, jamesd, :) ...

    we can be confident that some actively managed funds will do better than trackers, others worse. the point is: can we tell which will do better, without hindsight?
  • I have to admit that I bought Fundology some years ago. I can't say I really rate it -- it seems to be a sales pitch at why active fund management is good.

    The 'sales pitch' done elsewhere (eg the Monevator site) has convinced me that trackers are the most efficient way of growing your money in the long term.

    I think I spent £15 or £20 on my copy -- waste of money!

    Ho hum!
  • BLB53
    BLB53 Posts: 1,583 Forumite
    If there really is a work out there that makes a strong case for active investment, and that shows investors how they can get better long-term results from it, then I'd very much like to read that book.
    gadget,
    if you get the chance to read the 'Slow & Steady Steps' ebook, I would appreciate reading a review - enjoyed your previous review a month or so back (was it on Smarter Investing?)

    BLB
  • gadgetmind
    gadgetmind Posts: 11,130 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    BLB53 wrote: »
    gadget,
    if you get the chance to read the 'Slow & Steady Steps' ebook, I would appreciate reading a review

    It's on my list.
    enjoyed your previous review a month or so back (was it on Smarter Investing?)

    I've done a few and am pretty sure that I covered that one.

    I think this one was my latest.

    https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/53368957#Comment_53368957

    and here's another

    https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/47348009#Comment_47348009

    and another

    https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/50785641#Comment_50785641

    Hmmm, maybe I did miss Mr. Hale!
    I am not a financial adviser and neither do I play one on television. I might occasionally give bad advice but at least it's free.

    Like all religions, the Faith of the Invisible Pink Unicorns is based upon both logic and faith. We have faith that they are pink; we logically know that they are invisible because we can't see them.
  • gadgetmind
    gadgetmind Posts: 11,130 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    jamesd wrote: »
    The author was manager of funds of funds which are among the most commonly recommended because they do out-perform.

    Some do, some don't, and those that have in the past may not in the future.

    As it happens, I do hold a fund of funds, but it's a low fee (0.5%) fund that uses mainly Blackrock tracks as the components. I don't have any great axe to grind with active funds other than their breathtaking and return-sapping fees.
    The book did say how to approach selecting funds. If you found that that lacked formulas that's no surprise, since the focus there was on picking active funds and those aren't well characterised by formulas.

    It's a while since I read it, but ISTR he recommended recentism and getting to know the fund manager. The latter might work well for those who can moor their super yacht alongside the manager's super-yatch when they are both next in Monaco and pop over for a G&T and a cosy chat.
    I am not a financial adviser and neither do I play one on television. I might occasionally give bad advice but at least it's free.

    Like all religions, the Faith of the Invisible Pink Unicorns is based upon both logic and faith. We have faith that they are pink; we logically know that they are invisible because we can't see them.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.