We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

EU agrees 'open skies' deal

It might not mean much to most people but the EU has finally agreed an 'open skies' deal with the US which essentially opens up Heathrow to competition across the Atlantic from next March... BA and Virgin aren't very happy about it but that's only because their monopoly's going to end.

BMI will finally begin long-haul flights out of Heathrow but talks of a price war will depend on carriers gaining slots which are in short supply. The consumer, however, can only win.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/6477969.stm

Comments

  • wdyw
    wdyw Posts: 962 Forumite
    mixu wrote: »
    It might not mean much to most people but the EU has finally agreed an 'open skies' deal with the US which essentially opens up Heathrow to competition across the Atlantic from next March... BA and Virgin aren't very happy about it but that's only because their monopoly's going to end.

    BMI will finally begin long-haul flights out of Heathrow but talks of a price war will depend on carriers gaining slots which are in short supply. The consumer, however, can only win.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/6477969.stm

    Goodish news. We shafted the USA with the Bermuda agreement in 46 and moreso with Bermuda II in 77 but it was only a matter of time before the USA got the fifth freedom and cabotage rights they have been after since the days of President Carter. It will be interesting to see what the fine print does say and whether there will be any capacity controls and break of gauge rights. What would really help us in the UK was for us to follow the USA on landing, navigation and en-route charges. Historically it was the smaller European countries that wanted open skies with NA while the big three of france Germany and the UK wanted even stricter controls.

    The last figures I came across had the landing fees at Manchester being the most expensive in the world. (in mid/late 80's). Cost $8157 to land a 747 with a load factor of 70% compared to $6477 at Heathrow and $490 at San Francisco. ..and as for en-route costs, to fly the same 747 500km over the UK cost $1134 while over the USA its completely free.
  • blindman
    blindman Posts: 5,700
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Forumite
    mixu wrote: »
    It might not mean much to most people but the EU has finally agreed an 'open skies' deal with the US which essentially opens up Heathrow to competition across the Atlantic from next March... BA and Virgin aren't very happy about it but that's only because their monopoly's going to end.

    BMI will finally begin long-haul flights out of Heathrow but talks of a price war will depend on carriers gaining slots which are in short supply. The consumer, however, can only win.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/6477969.stm

    Mentioned that here

    Delayed until next March
    However, at Britain's request, EU ministers agreed to delay plans to implement the deal from October this year to March 2008.

    General discussion on flyertalk
    BMI thread on flyertalk
  • I wouldn't expect to see a rush of new airlines flying into Heathrow any time soon, as the comment above explains how slots are scarce and [often] prohibitively expensive, especially for the less well-established carriers.

    I'm very surprised we've not heard more from the environmental campaigners as we're about to witness a MASSIVE increase in air traffic crossing the Atlantic. In the short term prices should drop which would be good for the consumer, but longer term we'll see airlines struggling to fill the over-capacity and increasingly look for merger opportunities or risk going bust.

    I think we're on the verge of monumental changes in the airline sector but I doubt much of it will benefit the travelling public.
  • wdyw
    wdyw Posts: 962 Forumite

    I think we're on the verge of monumental changes in the airline sector but I doubt much of it will benefit the travelling public.

    Don't know about that. Re-regualtion has been happening since the 1970's and at just about every step of theway has led to cheaper faresfor the public. Have a look back at the cost to fly London- NY before Laker went to court over double designation (and then convert that price to modern terms!!!). British Cascade Study from those days showed why non-scheduled flights were typically 36% of a scheduled flight cost. Times have moved on and while the various savings have changed there is no doubt that the cost of scheduled flights across the pond will now change. It's the fifth freedom rights/ break of gauge rights, cabotage rights etc that have a lot of EU based airline companies worried, and rightly so! Unless its covered in the fine print, there were always darn good reasons why the UK and other major European countries always knocked the USA back on modifying their respective bilateral agreements.
This discussion has been closed.
★ ★ ★ Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 355.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 456.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 248.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 605.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 179K Life & Family
  • 263.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.