We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Would I protected from cyber-theft?

With stories in the news today about cyber-crime and hackers attacking banks I wonder if our savings are hit are we covered under the FSCS?

Comments

  • Reaper
    Reaper Posts: 7,355 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    You are protected by the bank not the FSCS, provided you haven't done anything negligent like tell everyone your username and password.
  • talexuser
    talexuser Posts: 3,538 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    The interesting question is how you could PROVE to your bank you have not been negligent with password/pin etc?

    There used to be stories of cashpoint errors where the banks always said their systems were perfect, yet cases of internal fraud did occur but were loathe to be publicised by the banks.
  • bubieyehyeh
    bubieyehyeh Posts: 590 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Name Dropper
    talexuser wrote: »
    The interesting question is how you could PROVE to your bank you have not been negligent with password/pin etc?

    There used to be stories of cashpoint errors where the banks always said their systems were perfect, yet cases of internal fraud did occur but were loathe to be publicised by the banks.


    You don't have to prove anything. The rules say they must refund unless they can prove you were neglient.
  • grey_gym_sock
    grey_gym_sock Posts: 4,508 Forumite
    the danger is that they will argue that your password/pin was used to withdraw money, and therefore you must have either made the withdrawal yourself, or helped somebody else to, or been negligent.

    as with cashpoints cases, the banks are likely to assert that their systems were working properly, and that therefore there is no security hole that somebody else (e.g. rogue bank employees) might have exploited. this can be difficult to counter unless you have very good expert witnesses on your side.

    still, i wouldn't worry about it too much :) - there are downsides to everything, including new technology.
  • Glen_Clark
    Glen_Clark Posts: 4,397 Forumite
    Rather than worry about it, you would be better employed by thinking up an unusual password, then something that reminds you of it that you can write down to remind you of it instead of writing down the password anywhere.
    “It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.” --Upton Sinclair
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.