We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Title Restrictions - Help!!!
Comments
-
according to this thread below, you only need to inform the party who placed the restriction that the property is sold and that's it.
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/18395390 -
in my case the property is a reposetion and has been empty since 2005. The seller is trying to force me to exchange contracts with the restriction still in place, they say that it can be removed after completeion. My solicitor does not agree and is not comfortable that it can be removed after completion???Gregg - our situations are more similar than I thought! Mine is also a reposession and the seller is also trying to pressure me into exchanging ("just take a view on it" is her expression). My solicitor is adament this needs sorting prior to exchange. My understanding is that the contact at the selling company is just some kind of admin person and doesn't understand the legal complexities!
If these two purchases are from mortgagees in possession I don't understand the buyers's solicitors' attitude, as a transfer by a mortgagee overreaches (bypasses) this sort of restriction because it applies to the registered proprietor of the property (who has been evicted) and not to the mortgagee.
The restriction itself is a normal tenants in common restriction and nothing to be worried about in an ordinary (non-mortgagee in possession case) as long as both signatures are obtained.RICHARD WEBSTER
As a retired conveyancing solicitor I believe the information given in the post to be useful assuming any properties concerned are in England/Wales but I accept no liability for it.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards